Kerala

StateCommission

865/2003

The Manager - Complainant(s)

Versus

Nizar Ahamed - Opp.Party(s)

P.Shrihari

08 Jun 2010

ORDER

First Appeal No. 865/2003
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. 109/2003 of District Kasaragod)
1. The ManagerKarnataka Bank Ltd,Chikmagalur Branch,Chikmangalur
PRESENT :

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

 

       I.A.894/09 IN APPEAL:865/03

 

       ORDER DATED: 03-07-2010

 

PRESENT:

 

JUSTICE SHRI. K.R. UDAYABHANU    :   PRESIDENT

 

SHRI.S. CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR                   : MEMBER

 

The Manager,

The Karnataka Bank Ltd.,

Chikamangalur Branch,                                       : PETITIONER

Chikamangalur-577 101.

 

(By Adv: Sri.G.S.Kalkura)

 

            Vs.

1.Nizar Ahamed,

  S/o Sheik Ahmed,

  R/at S.M.N.Asiyana,

  Rappathotty, Uppala.P.O,

  Kasaragod.

                                                                                    : RESPONDENTS

2.The Manager,

  North Malabar Gramin Bank,

  Uppppala Branch,

  Uppala.P.O,

  Kasaragod.

ORDER

 

JUSTICE SHRI. K.R. UDAYABHANU: RESIDENT

 

Petitioner is the opposite party in OP.109/03 in the file of CDRF, Kasaragod.  The appellant is under orders to pay Rs.54,000/- to the complainant.  The application has been filed to condone the delay of 2093 days in curing the defect for non deposit of the statutory amount which is a pre-requisite for filing the appeal.  In the affidavit filed by the power of attorney holder of the appellant it is mentioned that he was informed that the case bundle was not available in the office of this commission.  Subsequently the case bundle was traced out although at first it was learned that the case record has been taken to the Ernakulam camp sitting.  It is also mentioned in the affidavit that the case bundle was kept in the office of the commission while shifting the office to the new building.  After tracing out the case bundle the deposit was made on 24/6/2009.

2. We find that there is no objective evidence to substantiate the case set up by the petitioner that the case bundle was missing.  The petitioner has not taken any steps in this regard for tracing out the case bundle if the same was missing.  In view of the fact that the delay is of 2093 days we find that the reason mentioned is not sufficient to condone the inordinate delay.

In the result the I.A is dismissed.  Hence the appeal is also dismissed.

 

JUSTICE K.R. UDAYABHANU:   PRESIDENT

VL.

 

S. CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR : MEMBER

 

PRONOUNCED :
Dated : 08 June 2010

[HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]PRESIDENT