Kerala

Kollam

CC/10/2021

Smt.Lailadas,aged 46 years, - Complainant(s)

Versus

Niyas, - Opp.Party(s)

30 Sep 2022

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Civil Station ,
Kollam-691013.
Kerala.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/10/2021
( Date of Filing : 05 Feb 2021 )
 
1. Smt.Lailadas,aged 46 years,
S/o.Mohandas(Late),Santhadas Bhavan, Kalluvathukkal.P.O,Kollam District-691578.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Niyas,
City Mobile,College Junction Attingal, Thiruvananthapuram Pin-695101.
2. Manager,
Xiaomi Technology India Private Limited,Ground Floor,A.K.R Infinity, Sy No.113,Krishna Reddy Industrial Area,7th Mile,Hosur Road,Bangalore-560103,Karnataka.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 30 Sep 2022
Final Order / Judgement

 

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL  COMMISSION, KOLLAM

Dated this the  30th     Day of  September  2022

 

  Present: -  Sri. E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim, B.A, LL.M. President

       Smt.S.Sandhya Rani, Bsc, L.L.B,Member

                   Sri.Stanly Harold, B.A.LLB, Member

 

                                                    CC.10/2021

 

Smt.Laila Das                                                  :           Complainant

S/o Mohan Das(Late)

Santha Das Bhavan

Kalluvathukkal P.O

Kollam-691578.

 

V/s

  1. Niyas                                                        :           Opposite parties

         City Mobile,College Junction

         Attingal,

         Thiruvananthapuram

         Pin-695101.

 

  1.          Manager

Xiaomi Technology India Pvt.Ltd.

Ground Floor,

A.K.R Infinity

Sy No.113,

Krishna Reddy Industrial Area

                  7th Mile,Hosur Road

Bangalore-56013, Karnataka.

 

 

FINAL   ORDER

E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM , B.A, LL.M, President

          Complainant absent and no representation for the complainant on this posting date also.  The complainant is continuously absent when the case is posted for recording exparte evidence but the complainant has not turned up nor adduced any evidence.  The 3 documents produced along with the complaint are not sufficient to prove any deficiency in service or any unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite party.

          In the circumstances we are inclined to dismiss the complaint.

          In the result complaint stands dismissed. 

          No costs.

                   Dated this the  30th   day of   September 2022.

 

E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim:Sd/-

S.Sandhya Rani:Sd/-

           Stanly Harold:Sd/-

          Forwarded/by Order

         Senior Superintendent

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.