Haryana

StateCommission

A/361/2022

HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN - Complainant(s)

Versus

NISHA - Opp.Party(s)

AMIT JAISWAL

04 Aug 2023

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA

                                                         

                                                          Date of Institution: 02.08.2022

                                                          Date of final hearing:04.08.2023

                                                          Date of Pronouncement: 04.08.2023

 

 

APPEAL NO.361 OF 2022

 

IN THE MATTER OF

 

1. Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran through its Chief Administrator, C-3, Sector-6, Panchkula.
2. Estate Officer, Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran, Sector-3, Panchkula.

 

 

                                      ….Appellants/Opposite Parties

Versus

 

 

Nisha W/o Shri Amit, R/o H.No.702, Ward No.18, Near Adarsh School, Shastri Nagar, Rohtak.

 

....Respondent/Complainant

 

         

CORAM:   Hon’ble Mr. Justice T.P.S. Mann, President

                   Ms. Manjula, Member                                                                                                                                         

 

Present:     Shri Amit Jaiswal, counsel for the appellants.

 

 

 

 

PER: T.P.S. MANN, J.

 

ORDER

 

 

1. The present appeal has been preferred by Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran through its Chief Administrator and Estate Officer, Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran (opposite parties) for challenging the order dated 22.04.2022 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rohtak whereby complaint preferred by complainant Nisha was allowed and the opposite parties were directed to refund the amount deposited by the complainant i.e. Rs.7,47,000/- alongwith interest @ 9% from the date of 45 days after surrender of plot i.e.30.10.2017 till its realization and also to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- as compensation on account of deficiency in service and Rs.5,000/- as litigation expenses.
2. Notice of the appeal was issued to the respondent. However, notice has not been received back served or otherwise whereas dasti process was collected by the appellants who has not returned the same.
3. Counsel for the appellantsstates that the appellants have since served the dasti process upon the respondent. He further states that the complainant has since withdrawn the execution as having been satisfied and accordingly, the appellants also want to withdraw the present appeal.
4. In view of the above, the appeal is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
5. Application(s) pending, if any, stand disposed of in terms of the aforesaid order.
6. A copy of this order be provided to all the parties free of cost as mandated by the law. The order be uploaded forthwith on the website of the Commission for the perusal of the parties.
7. File be consigned to record room along with a copy of this order.

 

 

 

(T.P.S. MANN)

PRESIDENT

 

 

 

(MANJULA)

MEMBER 

Pronounced On: 04.08.2023

MS