Haryana

Ambala

CC/132/2013

RAM LAL - Complainant(s)

Versus

NIC - Opp.Party(s)

MUNISH BAKSHI

02 Dec 2015

ORDER

                                                                                                                                         CC No.132 of 2013

                                                                                    Ram Lal Vs. NIC.

 

Present:          None for complainant.

                        Sh.R.K. Vig, Advocate for Ops.

 

                        Case called several times since morning but neither complainant nor his counsel has put in appearance.  Let the case be taken up at 12.35 P.M.

                                                                             Sd/-                                      Sd/-

                                                                        Member                                 President

                                                                                                                        02.12.2015

Present:          None for complainant.

                        Sh.R.K. Vig, Advocate for Ops.

 

                        Case taken up at 12.35 P.M and called repeatedly but none has put in appearance on behalf of complainant.   In the interest of justice, the case be again taken up at 3.10 P.M.

                                                                              Sd/-                                         Sd/-

                                                                        Member                                 President

                                                                                                                        02.12.2015

 

Present:          None for complainant.

                        Sh.R.K. Vig, Advocate for Ops.

 

                        Case taken up at 3.10 P.M. and called repeatedly but this time also neither complainant nor his counsel has put in appearance.  Perusal of file reveals that the case is fixed for evidence of complainant  since 13.11.2013 and complainant has availed five effective opportunities including last opportunity to tender his evidence but has failed to conclude the same rather opted not to come present in the court.  As such, it is presumed that the complainant is not interested in pursuing the present complaint.  Hence, the present complaint is dismissed in default for non-appearance of the complainant. Copies of this order be sent to parties concerned free of costs, as per rules.  File after due compliance be consigned to record room.  

Announced: 02.12.2015.                               Sd/-                                             Sd/-

                                                                    Member                                 President

                                                                                                                        

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.