FIRST ADDITIONAL BENCH

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION PUNJAB, DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR -37 A, CHANDIGARH

Misc. Applications No.1882 of 2016 & 359 of 2018

In

Execution Application No.04 of 2015

In

Consumer Complaint No.84 of 2012

   Date of Institution:  14.01.2015.

Date of Decision  : 20.09.2018.

M/s Master Cold Storage & Ice Factory, Village Sadha Chak, P.O. Bhogpur, Distt. Jalandhar through its Partner Sh. Harvinder Pal Singh. 

……..Decree Holder/Complainant

Versus

1. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Branch Office, Kamaldeep Mansions, Phagwara through its Branch Manager. 
2. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., 4^th Floor, Surya Tower, 108, The Mall, Ludhiana through its Regional Manager. 
3. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., DO-11, GTB Nagar, Jalandhar through its Senior Divisional Manager. 
4. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., 87, M.G. Road, Fort, Mumbai through its CEO/MD/Chairman/Principal Officer. 
5. Protocol Surveyors & Engineers Pvt. Ltd., Protocol House, A-56, Sector-7, Noida through its CEO/MD/Chairman/Principal Officer. 
6. M/s Vij Engineer’s Enterprises, Surveyors and Loss Assessors, BMC Chowk, Jalandhar through its partner/proprietor. 
7. Sh. Jasdhir Singh Sooch, Development Officer at The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Branch Office, Kamaldeep Mansions, Phagwara. 
8. Canara Bank, Behram Sanisha, District Jalandhar through its Branch Manager.   

Judgment Debtor/Opposite Party

Execution application under Section 27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

Quorum:-

Sh. J.S. Klar, Presiding Judicial Member

Smt. Kiran Sibal,     Member

Present:-

For the DH/complainant    :          Sh. Munish Goel, Advocate

For JD Nos. 1to4             :         Sh. Parminder Singh, Advocate

For JD No.5to8                :         None

J.S. KLAR, PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER:-

          Counsel for the DH/complainant has made a statement that he has received the amount of Rs. 4,60,260/- by way of demand draft bearing No.635886 dated 18.09.2018 from counsel for JDs No.1to4 in favour of DH.  The Photostat copy of the demand draft is Mark-A on behalf of DH.  The Claim of the DH is fully satisfied and he withdraws this execution application.

In view of statement of counsel for DHs/complainants, the execution application is ordered to be dismissed as fully satisfied.

                                                             (J.S. KLAR)

                                                 Presiding Judicial Member

                                                                (KIRAN SIBAL)

                                                                       Member                                                                                               

September 20, 2018

DB