West Bengal

Hooghly

CC/68/2014

Ashok Kr. Paul - Complainant(s)

Versus

NIA - Opp.Party(s)

31 Oct 2017

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, HOOGHLY
CC OF 2013
PETITIONER
VERS
OPPO
 
Complaint Case No. CC/68/2014
 
1. Ashok Kr. Paul
Chinsurah, Hooghly
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. NIA
Chinsurah, Hooghly
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sri Biswanath De PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sri Samaresh Kr. Mitra MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 31 Oct 2017
Final Order / Judgement

The fact of the case of the complainant is that the complainant is a Mediclaim policy holder being Customer ID no. 8H2387356 under the oP since 28.09.2010. On 27.9.2013 the complainant purchased one policy from the date 28.9.2013 to 27.9.2014 with a premium of Rs.5916. The OP sent the policy as mentioned in para no. being policy no. 51250334130100000608. After six months i.e. on 26.2.2014 the complainant was informed that cheque issued by him has

                                                                   

not been cleared by S.B.I. for insufficient of fund, as such the aforesaid policy was cancelled. The complainant then contacted the oP but no result. It is also stated by the complainant that Pass Book of the Savings Account shows no entry. Finding no satisfactory reply from the Op the complainant filed this case to receive from the complainant the said amount of  Rs.5916/-  and to revive the cancelled policy and other reliefs.

            OP no.2 contested the case denying inter alia all material allegations. The Op received the cheque subject to realisation of the cheque amount and issued the policy. But the said premium cheque was returned by S.B.I., India Chinsurah branch for insufficient fund. So, the Op cancelled the said policy. The complainant has committed a Criminal offence under 138 of N.I.Act. Said policy was void ab initio issuance of new policy does not arise at all. Therefore, the complainant’s case deserved to be dismissed.

            Complainant filed copy of Collection receipt cum adjustment voucher, copy of policy schedule, copy of Cheque Dishonour and copy of Bank Pass Book. The complainant also filed Evidence in chief. OP on the other hand filed copy of

 

                                                                 

Cheque dishonour, copy of cheque dated 27.9.2013, copy of Peon Book and other documents. Op also filed Evidence in chief and W.N.A.

POINTS FOR DECISION :

  1. Whether the complainant is a consumer ?                                              
  2. Whether there is any deficiency in service on the part of the oP ?                                               
  3. Whether the complainant/petitioner is entitled to get relief as prayed for ?

DECISION WITH REASONS :

            It is admitted fact that the complainant issued a cheque for a sum of Rs.5916/-  for purchasing a Mediclaim policy from the oP on 27.09.2013.  The Op issued the policy subject to realisation of the said cheque. Accordingly, the Op placed the cheque for encashment in the S.B.I. chinsurah, Branch . But the said cheque was dishonoured for insufficient fund. The Opposite Party issued a letter to that effect to the complainant regarding cancellation of policy on 26.2.2014. From the documents filed by the Op Annxure 4 shows that the said cheque was returned for insufficient fund. The Pass Book of complainant does not show any debit of Rs.5916/- in that cheque stated hereinbefore. Accordingly, there is no

                                                               

deficiency of service of the oP. So, we are of opinion that the complainant fails to prove his case regarding facts alleged in the complaint. Hence it is-

                                                            ORDERED

            That the CC no. 68 of 2014 be and the same is dismissed on contest.

            Let a copy of this order be made over to the parties free of cost.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sri Biswanath De]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sri Samaresh Kr. Mitra]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.