Delhi

StateCommission

FA/512/2014

SUKHBIR SHARMA - Complainant(s)

Versus

NEXT RETAIL INDIA LTD. & ANR. - Opp.Party(s)

17 Jul 2014

ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHI
Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
 
First Appeal No. FA/512/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated 17/12/2013 in Case No. CC/12/2012 of District South II)
 
1. SUKHBIR SHARMA
R/O A-24 1ST FLOOR,OLD DOUBLE STORY LAJPAT NAGAR,NEW DELHI 110017
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. NEXT RETAIL INDIA LTD. & ANR.
K-44,LAJPAT NAGAR PART -II CENTRAL MARKET ,NEW DELHI
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

                      Date of Decision:  17.7.2014

                                                                                           

First Appeal-512/2014

 

 

Sukhbir Sharma

r/o A-24, 1st Floor, Old Double Storey

New Delhi-17

 

 

     .........Appellant

VS

 

 

 

  1. Next Retail India Ltd.

K-44, Lajpat Nagar Part-II,

Central Market, New Delhi

(through Mr. Vipul Bhardwaj)

 

  1. Videocon Industries Ltd.

North Region Office,

45, Okhla Industrial Estate Phase-III,

New Delhi-62

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

………...Respondents       

 

CORAM

SALMA NOOR, MEMBER

N P KAUSHIK, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

 

1.   Whether reporters of local newspaper be allowed to see the judgment? 

2.   To be referred to the reporter or not?

 

Salma Noor (Member)

 

1.     In a complaint case bearing No. 11/12, titled as Sukhbir Sharma Vs. Next Retail India Ltd. pending before District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum -II, Qutab Institutional Area, New Delhi, the Complainant had not put his appearance before the District Forum on 17.12.2013 and the Forum dismissed the complaint in complainant’s default. 

3.                In the present appeal before this Commission,   Complainant/Appellant has prayed for setting aside the dismissal orders.

4.         We have heard Shri M.P. Thakur, Appellant in this appeal at the admission stage itself.

4.         The appellant/complainant submits that due to personal difficulty he could not put his appearance before the Forum on 17.12.2013 and the Forum dismissed the complainant in complainant’s default.

5.         We do not find any reason for not believing the version of the complainant/appellant.  Policy of law is not to stile a contest.  In such circumstances lenient view is required to be taken so as to allow the complaint and the matter may be decided on merit. We, therefore, allow the appeal setting aside the dismissal orders dated 17.12.2013 and remand the case back to District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum -II, Qutab Institutional Area, New Delhi with a direction to restore the complaint to its original number, and to proceed in the case according to law.  The Appellant Complainant is directed to appear before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum -II, Qutab Institutional Area,  New Delhi on 20.8.2014.

6.         Copy of this order be sent to District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum -II, Qutab Institutional Area, New Delhi for information and to keep it on record and compliance and a copy of this order be transmitted to both the parties.

 

 

 

 
 
[HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.