BHIM MAHARAJ filed a consumer case on 29 Jan 2010 against NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. in the NCDRC Consumer Court. The case no is RP/4421/2009 and the judgment uploaded on 11 May 2010.
NCDRC
NCDRC
RP/4421/2009
BHIM MAHARAJ - Complainant(s)
Versus
NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. - Opp.Party(s)
MR. RAJESH KUMAR BHAWNANI
29 Jan 2010
ORDER
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 4421 OF 2009
(Against the Order dated 20/08/2009 in Appeal No. 433 & 459/2007 of the State Commission Chhattisgarh)
1. NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. Divisional Office, Korba,Korba,(C.G.)2. BRANCH MANAGER, THE NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,Branch Office, Sattiguri Chowk,Raigarh,(C.G.)
...........Respondent(s)
BEFORE:
For the Petitioner :
NEMO
For the Respondent :
NEMO
Dated : 29 Jan 2010
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for petitioner, on admission. Factual backgrounds are that petitioners insured truck met with an accident and suffered extensive damages. A claim was lodged with respondent-Insurance Company whereupon a Surveyor came to be appointed, who assessed loss of Rs.2,97,00/-. The Insurance Company, however, repudiated claim of petitioner, holding that petitioner had failed to make available documents to Surveyor during inspection. Resultantly, a consumer complaint came to be filed with District Forum, which on consideration of rival contentions raised, awarded compensation of Rs.6,00,000/- payable by Insurance Company. Appeals were preferred against aforesaid finding of District Forum both by petitioner and Insurance Company. The grievance of petitioner before State Commission was that assessment of loss made by Surveyor was much less than estimate of repair costs made by authorised service centre of Tata Motors. State Commission, however, on consideration of finding of Surveyor, reduced compensation to Rs.3,07,858.60p and accordingly modified award of District Forum. No revision has, however, been filed by Insurance Company against modified award of State Commission and petitioner is in revision for enhancement of compensation and for restoration of order of District Forum. Having gone through finding of State Commission, we find that State Commission on consideration of report of Surveyor has taken notice of issues involved and finding so recorded by State Commission does not require any interference. Revision petition, in the circumstances, is dismissed with no order as to cost.
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.