Maharashtra

DCF, South Mumbai

CC/136/2010

Mr.Harishandra Gulati - Complainant(s)

Versus

New india Assurance co.Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Ganesh Shirke

21 Oct 2011

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/136/2010
 
1. Mr.Harishandra Gulati
8/207 Nandadeep western Eक्ष्press Highway bandra
Mumbai
Maharashtra
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. New india Assurance co.Ltd.
D.O. 111400 Motimhal Tata rd
Mumbai-20
Maharashtra
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE PRESIDENT
  Shri S.S. Patil , HONORABLE MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

Order Below Exhibit 1
 

PER SHRI. S.S.PATIL - HON’BLE MEMBER :
 
The Complainant has not filed this complaint within prescribed period of limitation. Therefore, the Complainant had filed separate application for condonation of delay. Said application was numbered as M.A.No.32/2010. After hearing Ld.Advocate for the Complainant, Misc. Application No.32/2010 for condonation of delay is rejected. Therefore, complaint is dismissed as barred by law of limitation. No order as to costs.

 

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Shri S.S. Patil , HONORABLE]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.