NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/3466/2009

DR. RAJESH AGARWAL - Complainant(s)

Versus

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. SURAJ SAXENA

23 Oct 2009

ORDER

Date of Filing: 14 Sep 2009

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/3466/2009
(Against the Order dated 29/05/2009 in Appeal No. 675/2009 of the State Commission Punjab)
1. DR. RAJESH AGARWALS/o. Shri Sham Sunder Agarwal. 60, Cool Road. allandhar ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Jaliandhar Punjab ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. B.K. TAIMNI ,MEMBER
For the Appellant :MR. SURAJ SAXENA
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 23 Oct 2009
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Fora below have dismissed the claim filed by the petitioner on the ground that the person who was driving the vehicle, did not have a valid and effective licence on the date of accident. Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and this Commission in a number of cases have taken a view that in the absence of effective driving licence, the Insurance Company is not liable to compensate for the loss caused. Renewal of a fake licence does not validate the licence. Dismissed.



......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................B.K. TAIMNIMEMBER