Haryana

Jind

CC/167/2021

Samunder - Complainant(s)

Versus

New India Ansurance Co. Ltd. etc. - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. K. B. Nagar

17 Nov 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION ,JIND
MINI SECRETARIAT JIND-126102
 
Complaint Case No. CC/167/2021
( Date of Filing : 04 Feb 2021 )
 
1. Samunder
R/o Village Budha Khera Lather Teh. Julana Distt. Jind
Jind
Haryana
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. New India Ansurance Co. Ltd. etc.
LIC Building U.E. HUDA Distt. Shopping Center Jind
Jind
Haryana
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. A.K.SARDANA PRESIDENT
  SMT. NEERU AGGARWAL MEMBER
  MR.GURU DATT GOYAL MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
Sh. None on behalf of complainant.
......for the Complainant
 
Sh. Vinod Bhardwaj, Adv. counsel on behalf of OPs No.1 & 2.
......for the Opp. Party
Dated : 17 Nov 2022
Final Order / Judgement

On 21.10.2022, learned counsel for OPs No.1 & 2 had brought into notice of this Commission that OP-Insurance Company has already disbursed death claim of buffalo to the tune of Rs.77000/- vide cheque No.10476 dated 21.12.2020 and no amount of the complainant is remained due and also produced photocopy of the payment voucher vide which payment has been paid to the complainant.  So, complainant’s counsel was directed to secure presence of the complainant in person before the Commission on 12.11.2022  and thereafter on 17.11.2022. 

                        Today neither complainant nor his counsel is present. This act & conduct of complainant reveals that he has received the awarded amount, so he is not interested in pursuing the present complaint and opted not to come present before the Commission. It is 12.00 P.M.  Let, case file be again put up after lunch break.

 

  Member               Member                                President

                                                                                                    DCDRC, Jind

                                                                                                    17.11.2022

 

Present:           Sh. None on behalf of complainant.

                        Sh. Vinod Bhardwaj, Adv. counsel on behalf of OPs No.1 & 2.

 

                        Case file taken up but this time also neither complainant nor his representative appeared before the Commission.  Case called several times. It is 3.40 P.M. Waited sufficiently. Further wait seems not to be justified. Accordingly, we have no option except to dismiss the present complaint for want of prosecution.  Hence, the present complaint is hereby dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Certified copies of the order be sent to the parties concerned, as per rules. File after due compliance be consigned to the record room.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. A.K.SARDANA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ SMT. NEERU AGGARWAL]
MEMBER
 
 
[ MR.GURU DATT GOYAL]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.