AJAY KUMAR filed a consumer case on 06 Sep 2019 against NEW DIMENSION ECO PROJECTS LTD. in the West Delhi Consumer Court. The case no is CC/13/316 and the judgment uploaded on 11 Sep 2019.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (WEST).
150-151; COMMUNINTY CENTER ; C-BLOCK; JANAK PURI; NEW DELHI
CASE NO. 316/13
Sh. Ajay Kumar Dingra
D-66, New Multan Nagar,
New Delhi-110056 ..…. Complainant
VERSUS
New Dimension Eco Projects Ltd.
Through its Director Mr. Anil Bhatia
First Floor,
17, South Patel Nagar
New Delhi-110008 ….Opposite Party
O R D E R
K.S. MOHI, PRESIDENT
The complainant has filed the present complaint against the O.P under section 12 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Brief facts of the case are that OP deals in business of Solar Electric System which produce electricity to meet the requirement of electricity of house hold. The complainant came to know about business of OP through newspaper wherein advertisement was given in different local newspaper for appointment of authorized dealer at smaller scale. The complainant was looking to earn his livelihood for his family members and thus contacted OP on phone when he was called to visit the office address of OP. The OP gave to him a Solar Electric System and the cost of complete set was for a sum of 1,35,000/- including 30% i.e. Rs. 40,500/- subsidy granted by the government. After getting assurance by OP complainant paid a sum of Rs. 5,000/- through cheque on 03.01.2013 . It was also agreed by OP that in case of dis-satisfaction about the Solar Electric System the entire amount paid by the complainant without any deduction shall be returned to the complainant. After receipt of sum of Rs. 45,000/- vide cheque NO. 0531161 dated 14.02.2013 OP installed Solar Electric System but the system was not having capacity as it was agreed upon between the parties as a result after installation of system it did not work out properly. OP assured that everything would fall in line. On assurance by OP complainant further advanced a sum of Rs. 50,000/- vide cheque No. 0531162 dated 08.04.2013. However after having fed up with the services of Solar System complainant approached OP and apprised it of his grievance as a result on 06.05.2013 OP sent his two employees who told complainant that they have been sent by OP to take back Solar System for replacing the same but after lapse of more 25 days neither old Solar System nor the new one was supplied to complainant. Hence the present complaint for refund of Rs. 1,00,000/- and compensation.
2. OP filed written statement by taking preliminary objection that complainant is not a consumer also complainant inclined to become an authorized dealer of OP and as such was required to fulfill certain terms and conditions and also required to make deposit as per condition of business which he failed to do. OP never sold a product to complainant in any manner. The complainant never purchased any product from OP nor did he file any receipt /bill/cash memo issued by OP. It is further admitted that equipment supplied to complainant for Rs. 1,35,000/- was provided just for demonstration purpose not for any personal consumption. The complainant failed to deposit minimum required amount to become an authorized dealer of OP. It was clearly mentioned in the advertisement that the applicant who wished to become authorized dealer will have to deposit minimum amount of Rs.2,00,000/- for obtaining dealership. The complainant is also guilty of suppression of facts.
The OP on the other handdespite ample opportunities by Forum did not file affidavit of evidence.Secondly the rightof OP to fileevidence was struck off by the Forumvide order dated 15.11.2016 and thereafterOP stopped attending the court proceeding
4. We have heard the complainant in person and perused record.
5. We have perused the documents such as advertisement of OP , letter dated 09.02.2013 and e-mails sent by complainant to OP. The advertisement is quite alluring whereby complainant was totally misled for installation of the Solar Electric System by which he could have been able to earn his livelihood. It has been proved by the complainant that OP failed to supply the solar set as promised in the advertisement nor did include the name of complainant in the list of authorized dealer despite payment of Rs. 1,00,000/- by the complainant. The OP on the other hand, though claimed that it was the complainant who did not comply the terms and conditions of the agreement by depositing the minimum amount for dealership. This plea of OP does not hold water because the OP has not filed or proved any document in this regard. Therefore, plea taken by OP remains an oral claim not supported by any cogent evidence. From the documents placed on record by the complainant the deficiency on the part of OP is writ large. We have no hesitation in coming to the conclusion that the complainant has substantiated the contents of the complainant by adducing convincing evidence on record.
Keeping in view the discussion stated above, we pass an award for refund of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) in favour of Complainant against OP to paid within 45 days from the date of receipt of this order failing which OP shall liable to pay interest @ 6% p.a from the date of filing the petition till actual realization. Further, we award compensation of Rs. 15,000/- for mental and physical harassment and litigation expenses.
Copy of this order be sent to the parties as per rules.
File be consigned to the record room.
Announced this___6TH___ day of __September _____ 2019.
( K.S. MOHI ) (PUNEET LAMBA)
PRESIDENT MEMBER
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.