Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/90/2018

Sri Purna Chandra Sahu, aged 62 years - Complainant(s)

Versus

NESCO (Utility) being represented through its Authority Signatory Executive Engineer, Electrical Div - Opp.Party(s)

Sri Hrudananda Barik & others

27 Feb 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/90/2018
( Date of Filing : 26 Dec 2018 )
 
1. Sri Purna Chandra Sahu, aged 62 years
S/o. Late Bhagaban Sahu, At/P.O- Bishnupur, P.S- Baliapal, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. NESCO (Utility) being represented through its Authority Signatory Executive Engineer, Electrical Division, Basta
At/P.O- Basta, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
2. NESCO (Utility) being represented through its Authority Signatory Sub-Divisional Officer, Electrical, Jamsuli
At/P.O- Jamsuli, P.S- Singla, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
3. The Junior Engineer, Electrical, NESCO Utility, Supply Section, Baliapal
At/P.O/P.S- Baliapal, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 Sri Shashadhar Behera, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
 Sri Shashadhar Behera, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
 Sri Shashadhar Behera, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
Dated : 27 Feb 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The case is posted today for hearing on interim petition on contest & main hearing. Neither the complainant nor his Advocate is present nor taken any step. Advocate for the O.Ps is present & files hazira. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up.   

                                         In the present case, the O.Ps were appeared and filed the w/v only for O.P No.2. As it appears from the case record that the complainant remained absent since 13.02.19 to till today, for which hearing of the case impaired and the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Further, the interim petition Dtd.26.12.18 is disposed of, as none moved the same. Considering the nature and conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.   

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed against the O.Ps is treated to be infructuous.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.