Punjab

Rupnagar

CC/18/90

Sh.Darshan Lal - Complainant(s)

Versus

Nature Heights Infra Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

Ms. Sofia Paul

24 Jan 2019

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTT. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ROPAR

                                  Consumer Complaint No. :  90 of 08.10.2018

                                  Date of decision           :    24.01.2019

 

Darshan Lal  son of Krishazn Lal, resident of House No.2198, Mohalla Chhota Khera, Tehsil & District Ropar  (Punjab) 

                                                                    ......Complainant

                                             Versus

  1. M/s Nature Heights Infra Limited, through Sh. Neeraj Thatai @ Neeraj Arora, (Managing Director) 9, Sunder Nagri, Near Children Park, Hanumangarh Road, Abohar (Punjab). 
  2. Nature Heights Infra Limited, through Sh. Amit Kukar (Director) 9, Sunder Nagri, Near Children Park, Hanumangarh Road, Abohar (Punjab)
  3. Nature Heights Infra Limited, through Sh. Jasvir Singh Branch Manager, Opposite Sabji Mandi, Nuhon Colony, Tehsil & District Ropar (Punjab)   

                                                                             ...Opposite Parties

                                    Complaint under Section 12 of the                                               Consumer Protection Act, 1986

QUORUM

 

                         SH. KARNAIL SINGH AHHI, PRESIDENT

                         CAPT. YUVINDER SINGH MATTA, MEMBER

 

ARGUED BY

 

Ms. Sofia Paul, Adv. counsel for complainant  

O.Ps. exparte 

 

                                             ORDER

               SH. KARNAIL SINGH AHHI, PRESIDENT

1.          Complainant has filed the present complaint seeking directions to the opposite parties to refund the amount of Rs.29,120/- along with interest @ 18% per annum from the date of investment till date; to pay Rs.1,00,000/- as compensation on account of harassment, mental agony and unfair trade practice; to pay Rs.30,000/- as litigation charges: to pay Rs.10,000/- to complainant on account of Misc. expenses; any other relief which this Hon’ble Forum may deem fit and proper in favour of the complainant and against the O.Ps.  

2.     Brief facts made out from the complaint are that the project of the O.Ps. company was situated at Village Dhanehra, Tehsil Anandpur Sahib, District Ropar(Punjab), which was selling plots of different sizes of various prices. The O.Ps. company convinced to the complainant to book a plot of 5400 Sq. Ft, vide Ref ID No.10053146/201698. The total price of the said plot was Rs.1,25,000/-, which was to be paid in easy installments of Rs.1120/- each.  The Complainant deposited twenty six installments on time but after depositing the twenty six installments, the O.Ps. did not give the possession of the plot and complainant stopped depositing further installments. Hence, this complaint. 

   3.    On being put to the notice, none appeared on behalf of O.Ps., accordingly, they were proceeded against ex-parte vide order dated 23.01.2019.

4.     On being called upon to do so, the learned counsel for the complainant has tendered duly sworn affidavit of complainant Ex.CW1/A along with documents Ex.C1 to Ex.C27.

5.     We have heard the learned counsel for the complainant and have gone through the record of the file, carefully.

6.     Complainant counsel Ms.Sofia Paul, argued that on the allurement of O.Ps, the complainant agreed to purchase a plot of 5400 Sq.Ft and the total amount was payable of Rs.1,25,000/-. The complainant deposited Installment to the tune of Rs.1120/- with the O.Ps. After depositing twenty six installments the O.Ps. did not issued any agreement for sale qua the plot of 5400 Sq. She further argued that the evidence led by the complainant is un-rebutted as none appeared on behalf of O.Ps, despite issuance of notice. Lastly prayed to allow the complaint with costs.

7.     This complaint was presented in the month of October 2018, with specific recital that on the allurement of O.Ps, the complainant agreed to purchase the plot i.e.why deposited Rs.29,120/- vide different receipts Ex.C1, Ex,.C2 & Ex.C5 to Ex.C27. Complainant placed on file various documents and from the documents relied upon, this Forum has come to the conclusion that this Forum has the jurisdiction and complaint is maintainable.

 8.    Coming to the real controversy, whether the complainant has been able to prove deficiency on the part of O.Ps. or not. The installment was Rs.1120/- and the plot is of 5400 Sq.ft, complainant deposited Rs.29,120/- and rthen stopped payment. In support of the claim, complainant placed on file different receipts Ex.C1, Ex.C2 & Ex.C5 to Ex.C27. Beside this, complainant got issued legal notice dated 31.05.2018 to the O.Ps. through Advocate, Sofia Paul and after awaiting the adequate period filed the present complaint. This forum has gone through the receipts, vide which the complainant deposited the installments qua the plot of 5400 Sq. Ft at Village Dhanehra, Tehsil Anandpur Sahib, District Ropar. Further there are certain conditions like sale price of Rs.1,25,000/-, installment of Rs.1120/- monthly. After depositing the installments, the O.Ps. never issued sale agreement.   Rather in this forum, various complaint remains pending prior to the present complaint and despite notice none appeared on behalf of O.Ps. All the complaints stands already decided against the O.Ps. Moreso, the evidence led by the complainant is unrebutted. None appeared on behalf of O.Ps. despite issuance of notice. The complainant has been able to prove deficiency on the part of O.Ps. as O.Ps. received Rs.29,120/- but the O.Ps. did not issued agreement for sale.  So, the complaint deserves to be allowed. The responsibility of O.Ps. No.1 to 3 is joint because OP No.3  acted though in the capacity of Manager on behalf of O.Ps. No.1 & 2. They are liable to pay jointly and severally.

9.     In the light of discussion made above, the complaint stand allowed ex-parte with the directions to the O.Ps. to pay Rs.29,120/- with interest @ 8% per annum w.e.f. the respective dates of deposited i.e. Rs.1120/- on 28.02.2013, Rs1120/- on 02.04.2013, Rs.1120/- on 18.06.2013, Rs.1120/- on 18.06.2013, Rs.1120/- on 18.06.2013, Rs.1120/- on 28.09.2013, Rs.1120/- on 28.09.2013, Rs.1120/- on 29.01.2014, Rs.1120/- on 29.01.2014, Rs.1120/- on 29.01.2014, Rs.1120/- on 29.01.2014, Rs.1120/- on 21.02.2014, Rs.1120/- on 21.02.2014, Rs.1120/- on 26.05.2014, Rs.1120/- on 26.05.2014, Rs.1120/- on 07.08.2014, Rs.1120/- on 07.08.2014, Rs.1120/- on 28.10.2014, Rs.1120/- on 28.10.2014, Rs.1120/- on 15.12.2014, Rs.1120/- on 15.12.2014, Rs.1120/- on 01.05.2015, Rs.1120/- on 01.05.2015, Rs.1120/- on 02.06.2015, Rs.1120/- on 28.09.2013,  along with cost of Rs.10,000/-.

10.   The O.Ps. are further directed to comply with the order jointly and severally within the period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 

11.  The certified copies of this order be supplied to the parties forthwith, free of costs, as permissible under the rules and the file be indexed and consigned to Record Room.          

 

            ANNOUNCED                                   (KARNAIL SINGH AHHI)

            Dated.24.01.2019                              PRESIDENT
 

 

 

 

                                        (CAPT. YUVINDER SINGH MATTA)

                                                            MEMBER

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.