Sh. Amarjit Singh filed a consumer case on 24 Jan 2019 against Nature Heights Infra Ltd in the Rupnagar Consumer Court. The case no is CC/18/87 and the judgment uploaded on 08 Feb 2019.
BEFORE THE DISTT. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ROPAR
Consumer Complaint No. : 87 of 08.10.2018
Date of decision : 24.01.2019
Amarjit Singh, son of Rachan Singh, resident of Ward No.6, House No.99, Green Enclaev, Morinda, District Ropar (Punjab)
......Complainant
Versus
...Opposite Parties
Complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
QUORUM
SH. KARNAIL SINGH AHHI, PRESIDENT
CAPT. YUVINDER SINGH MATTA, MEMBER
ARGUED BY
Ms. Sofia Paul, Adv. counsel for complainant
O.Ps. exparte
ORDER
SH. KARNAIL SINGH AHHI, PRESIDENT
1. Complainant has filed the present complaint seeking directions to the opposite parties to refund the amount of Rs.2,36,240/- along with interest @ 18% per annum from the date of investment till date; to pay Rs.2,00,000/- as compensation on account of harassment, mental agony and unfair trade practice; to pay Rs.30,000/- as litigation charges: to pay Rs.10,000/- to complainant on account of Misc. expenses; any other relief which this Hon’ble Forum may deem fit and proper in favour of the complainant and against the O.Ps.
2. Brief facts made out from the complaint are that the project of the O.Ps. company was situated at Village Dhanehra, Tehsil Anandpur Sahib, District Ropar, which was selling plots of different sizes of various prices. On 05.09.2011, the complainant received an agreement for sale of one plot of 1500 Sq. Ft vide Ref ID No.10004226. The total price of the said plot was Rs.3,37,500/-, which was to be paid quarterly during the 6 years in easy installments of Rs.14,765/- each. The Complainant deposited the fourteen installments in time but after depositing the fourteen installments, the O.Ps. did not give the possession of the plot and complainant stopped depositing further installments. Hence, this complaint.
3. On being put to the notice, none appeared on behalf of O.Ps., accordingly, they were proceeded against ex-parte vide order dated 23.01.2019.
4. On being called upon to do so, the learned counsel for the complainant has tendered duly sworn affidavit of complainant Ex.CW1/A along with documents Ex.C1 to Ex.C18 and closed the evidence.
5. We have heard the learned counsel for the complainant and have gone through the record of the file, carefully.
6. Complainant counsel Ms.Sofia Paul, argued that on the allurement of O.Ps, the complainant agreed to purchase a plot of 1500 Sq.Ft and the total amount was payable of Rs.3,37,500/-. On 23.12.2011, the complainant deposited Installment to the tune of Rs.14,765/- with the O.Ps and they issued receipt then entered into agreement for sale dated 05.09.2011 qua the plot of 1500 Sq. Ft with Khasra numbers. Vide this said agreement, the O.Ps. agreed to carve out the area/colony and on completion of basis amenities, possession of the plot was to be delivered to the complainant. In compliance to the said agreement (Ex.C1), the complainant deposited total amount of Rs.2,06,710/- in fourteen installments then came to know that the office of the O.Ps. stands closed. No colony was carved out and various people told that fraud had been committed with the complainant i.e. why the complainant stopped further installments. Before filing the complaint, the complainant had various times requested the O.Ps. either to deliver the possession of the plot or to refund the amount deposited by him along with interest. She further argued that the evidence led by the complainant his un-rebutted as none appeared on behalf of O.Ps, despite issuance of notice. Lastly prayed to allow the complaint with costs.
7. This complaint was presented in the month of October 2018, with specific recital that on the allurement of O.Ps, the complainant agreed to purchase the plot i.e. why deposited Rs.2,06,710/- vide different receipts Ex.C2 to Ex.C15. The complainant also relied upon agreement Ex.C1, in which khasra numbers are mentioned, installment of Rs.14,765/- mentioned and O.Ps. also agreed to deliver the possession of the plot, in case failure then to refund the amount deposited by the complainant with interest. Complainant placed on file various documents including the report of Jalandhar Development Authority that no license was ever issued to the O.Ps. and from the documents relied upon, this Forum has come to the conclusion that this Forum has the jurisdiction and complaint is maintainable.
8. Coming to the real controversy, whether the complainant has been able to prove deficiency on the part of O.Ps. or not. As held in earlier part of the order, agreement Ex.C1, dated 05.09.2011 is on the file. The installment was Rs.14,765/- and the plot is of 1500 Sq.ft, complainant deposited Rs.2,06,710/- then stopped payment. In support of the claim, complainant placed on file different receipts Ex.C2 to Ex.C15. Beside this, complainant got issued legal notice dated 26.05.2018 to the O.Ps. through Advocate, Sofia Paul and after awaiting the adequate period filed the present complaint. This forum has gone through the agreement for sale dated 05.09.2011 vide which vender agreed to sell the property of Village Dhanera, Tehsil Anandpur Sahib, District Ropar. Further there are certain conditions like sale price of Rs.3,37,500/-, installment of Rs.14,765/- quarterly during the six years. On payment, the sale deed was to be executed, after obtaining all kinds of NOC, permission then Income Tax clearances etc but till today O.Ps. neither carved out the colony nor gave the dimensions, even not issued NOC as well as Income Tax clearances. Rather in this forum, various complaints remain pending prior to the present complaint and despite notice none appeared on behalf of O.Ps. All the complaints stands already decided against the O.Ps. Moreso, the evidence led by the complainant is un-rebutted. None appeared on behalf of O.Ps. despite issuance of notice. The complainant has been able to prove deficiency on the part of O.Ps. as O.Ps. received Rs.2,06,710/- but no effort to full fill the terms and conditions of the agreement to sell. So, the complaint deserves to be allowed. The responsibility of O.Ps. No.1 to 3 is joint because OP No.3 acted though in the capacity of Manager on behalf of O.Ps. No.1 & 2. They are liable to pay jointly and severally.
9. In the light of discussion made above, the complaint stand allowed ex-parte with the directions to the O.Ps. to pay Rs.2,06,710/- with interest @ 8% per annum w.e.f. the respective dates of deposited i.e. Rs.14765/- on 23.12.2011, Rs.14,765/- on 04.04.2012, Rs. 14765/- on 14.05.2012, Rs. 14765/- on 29.09.2012, Rs. 14765/- on 30.01.2013, Rs. 14765/- on 04.04.2013, Rs. 14765/- on 15.07.2013, Rs. 14765/- on 09.11.2013, Rs. 14765/- on 27.01.2014, Rs. 14765/- on 01.04.2014, Rs. 14765/- on 08.07.2014, Rs. 14765/- on 16.10.2014, Rs. 14765/- on 25.12.2014, Rs. 14765/- on 25.04.2015 along with cost of Rs.10,000/-.
10. The O.Ps. are further directed to comply with the order jointly and severally within the period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
11. The certified copies of this order be supplied to the parties forthwith, free of costs, as permissible under the rules and the file be indexed and consigned to Record Room.
ANNOUNCED (KARNAIL SINGH AHHI)
Dated.24.01.2019 PRESIDENT
(CAPT. YUVINDER SINGH MATTA)
MEMBER
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.