Kerala

Kasaragod

CC/09/212

M.N.Chithranandan - Complainant(s)

Versus

National Radio Electronics - Opp.Party(s)

10 Dec 2009

ORDER


IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD
OLD S.P. OFFICE, PULIKUNNU
consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/212

M.N.Chithranandan		 ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

Haier
National Radio Electronics 		...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. K.T.Sidhiq 2. P.P.Shymaladevi 3. P.Ramadevi

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):
1. M.N.Chithranandan

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. Haier 2. National Radio Electronics

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

                                                                Date of filing :24-09-09

                                                                 Date of order : 9-12-09

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD

                                                CC. No. 212/09

                        Dated this, the 9th   day   of December   2009.

PRESENT

SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ                                : PRESIDENT

SMT.P.RAMADEVI                                    : MEMBER

SMT.P.P.SHYMALADEVI             : MEMBER

 

M.N. Chithranandan,

R/at Railway Quarters No.20A,                         } Complainant

Kanhangad.

 

1. National Radio Electronics, Kanhangad.} Opposite parties

2. Haier Appliances (India) Pvt.Ltd.

     Consumer Care Centre, Kannur.

 

                                                    O R D E R

 

            Complainant present.  Opposite party represented.  Complainant submitted that the matter is settled with the opposite party and he is not pressing the complaint.  Hence the complaint is dismissed as settled.

    Sd/-                                                 Sd/-                                      Sd/-

MEMBER                                           MEMBER                               PRESIDENT

Pj/                                                                    Forwarded by Order

 

                                                                                         SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT




......................K.T.Sidhiq
......................P.P.Shymaladevi
......................P.Ramadevi