Haryana

Karnal

CC/370/2021

Rajat - Complainant(s)

Versus

National Insurance Company Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Ramesh Kumar

16 May 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint.No.370 of 2021

                                                          Date of instt.02.08.2021

                                                          Date of Decision:16.05.2023

 

Rajat son of Sh. Davinder Pal resident of village Ghisarpuri, Tehsil Indri District Karnal.

          ...…Complainant

                                        Versus

  1. National Insurance Company Limited, Karnal Division, Santokh market, Railway road, Karnal through its Authorized Signatory.
  2. National Insurance Company Limited, registered office at 3, middleton street, post box no.9229, Kolkata through its Director/authorized signatory.
  3. Amar Autos, Authorized dealer, Hero Motocorp Limited, Yamuna Nagar road, near Ware House Indri District Karnal, through its Authorized Signatory.

 

                        ....Opposite parties.

                                             

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                Smt. Dr. Rekha Chaudhary……..Member.

               

Present:  None for the complainant.

                Shri Pankaj Malhotra, counsel for the OPs-1 & 2.

                 

                Today the case is fixed for notice to the OP-3. Notice could not be issued for want of copy of complaint. No one has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. The present complaint pertains to years 2021 and same is still at the stage of preliminary hearing, repeatedly the case has been adjourned on the request of learned counsel for the complainant. Case called several times since morning but none has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. It is already 04:00 PM. It appears that complainant is no more interested to pursue his case. There is no justification to adjourn the case further for the same purpose.

                Hence, in view the above facts, the present complaint is hereby dismissed. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced
Dated:16.05.2023.            

                                President,     

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

 

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary) 

  Member                Member         

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.