West Bengal

StateCommission

A/758/2015

Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd. - Complainant(s)

Versus

National Insurance Co. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Ms. Atreyee De ( Ganguly)

26 Jun 2018

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST BENGAL
11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087
 
First Appeal No. A/758/2015
( Date of Filing : 09 Jul 2015 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 11/06/2015 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/252/2015 of District Kolkata-I(North))
 
1. Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd.
92E, Alipore Road, P.S - Chetla, Kolkata - 700 027.
2. Sri Lokenath Bhattacharya,
92E, Alipore Road, P.S - Chetla, Kolkata - 700 027.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. National Insurance Co. Ltd.
3, Middleton Street, Kolkata - 700 071.
2. The Divisional Manager
3A, Muzaffar Ahmed Street (Rippon Street), Kolkata - 700 016.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SHYAMAL GUPTA PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. UTPAL KUMAR BHATTACHARYA MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:Ms. Atreyee De ( Ganguly), Advocate
For the Respondent: D. B. Chowdhury, Advocate
Dated : 26 Jun 2018
Final Order / Judgement

Sri Shyamal Gupta, Member

The complaint case since been dismissed by the Ld. District Forum at the admission stage itself, aggrieved with such decision, this Appeal is filed by the Complainant of the complaint case.

The dispute revolves around an insurance claim that the Appellant lodged with the Respondents.  The said claim was ultimately repudiated by the Respondents over non- submission of documents.  

As the Appellant moved a writ before the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta before filing the complaint case  and the same was disposed of by the Hon’ble Court, in the opinion of the Ld. District Forum, it lacked any authority to adjudicate the dispute and accordingly dismissed the same.

Be it mentioned here that initially the Respondents appeared through their Ld. Advocate.  However, subsequently the concerned Ld. Advocate stopped turning up before this Commission.  Therefore, only the Ld. Advocate of the Appellant was heard at the time of hearing.

In this regard, it is submitted by the Appellant that the said writ was filed before repudiation of its claim and on the other hand, the complaint case was filed post repudiation of its claim by the Respondents. 

Having heard the Appellant and on perusal of the documents on record, it transpires that the Hon’ble Court did not adjudicate the case on merit.  On the basis of prayer of the Appellant, it asked the Respondents to dispose of Appellant’s claim in accordance with law by passing a reasoned order.

Given that the Hon’ble Court did not dispose of the case on merit, there was virtually no legal impediment to adjudicate the instant case by the Ld. District Forum.  Clearly, the Ld. District Forum grossly erred in understanding the true position of law in the matter.  We have no qualms, therefore, to annul such erroneous decision.

The Appeal, thus, succeeds.

Hence,

O R D E R E D

The Appeal stands allowed ex parte against the Respondents.  The impugned order is hereby set aside.  Appellant is directed to appear before the Ld. District Forum on 26-07-2018 for fresh adjudication of the matter on merit.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SHYAMAL GUPTA]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. UTPAL KUMAR BHATTACHARYA]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.