Delhi

East Delhi

CC/260/2023

M/S SAGAR AND SAGAR - Complainant(s)

Versus

NATIONAL INS. CO. LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

20 Sep 2023

ORDER

Present:-       Ms. Nancy Gupta Advocate for Complainant

 

Argument heard.

Put up at 4:00 pm.


At 4:00 PM.

Present:-      Ms. Nancy Gupta Advocate for Complainant

 

Arguments on admission heard. This is the case of complainant w.r.t. deficiency by the OP in repudiating the claim w.r.t. the accident of his vehicle.

The Commission has perused the record.

Apart from one sentence mentioned in the Para-3 in the complaint that the vehicle of the complainant met with an accident and suffered accident damages, there is no information as to where the accident had happened, who was driving the vehicle, whether that person was having valid Driving License at the time of driving the vehicle, who suffered injury, whether the matter was reported in Police Station or not, whether any FIR/NCR lodged got registered or not all such facts are missing.

The basic cause of action of the complainant in the complaint is w.r.t. the accident repudiating of the case claim whereas there is no trace of any fact w.r.t. the fact as to whether accident had actually happened or not. Therefore there is no disclosure of any cause of action w.r.t. details of the accident as explained herein above. Therefore present compliant is not maintainable in the present form. Therefore complaint is rejected.    

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.