National Housing Bank & one another V/S Smt. P. Sarojini - Consumer Court Case

Karnataka

Mysore

CD/2001/223

Smt. P. Sarojini - Complainant(s)

Versus

National Housing Bank & one another - Opp.Party(s)

10 Oct 2002

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORE
No.845, 10th Main, New Kantharaj Urs Road, G.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagar, Mysore - 570 009
consumer case(CC) No. CD/2001/223

Smt. P. Sarojini						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
National Housing Bank & one another National Housing Bank						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

This judgement and order is pronounced in the open court on seperate sheets of paper today. Complaint is partly allowed. Opposite party No.1 is directed to consider the claim of the complainant, that is, account No.267 as if she had deposit of Rs.6,510/- as on August 1994, unless there is some other materials to show that claim is false, without insisting for any other documents like, receipts, statements and verification certificate. 3.Opposite party No.1 shall settle claim along with all other claims as per the direction issued by company law court from time to time inclusive of interest if any. 4.Parties to bear their own costs. Send the certified copies of this judgement and order to both parties under certificate of posting and to opposite party No.1 by RPAD.

This judgement and order is pronounced in the open court on seperate sheets of paper today. Complaint is partly allowed. Opposite party No.1 is directed to consider the claim of the complainant, that is, account No.267 as if she had deposit of Rs.6,510/- as on August 1994, unless there is some other materials to show that claim is false, without insisting for any other documents like, receipts, statements and verification certificate. 3.Opposite party No.1 shall settle claim along with all other claims as per the direction issued by company law court from time to time inclusive of interest if any. 4.Parties to bear their own costs. Send the certified copies of this judgement and order to both parties under certificate of posting and to opposite party No.1 by RPAD.