Maharashtra

StateCommission

MA/10/302

SHRI. MUKHTYARSINGH JAYSINGH PATIL AND 1 OTHERS - Complainant(s)

Versus

NASHIK MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND 1 OTHERS - Opp.Party(s)

VIKASH TAKALKAR

03 Aug 2010

ORDER


BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL

COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/10/302
1. SHRI. MUKHTYARSINGH JAYSINGH PATIL AND 1 OTHERSEKLORA NASHIK ROAD NASHIK NASHIKMAHARASHTRA ...........Appellant(s)

Versus
1. NASHIK MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND 1 OTHERS NASHIKNASHIKMAHARASHTRA ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE :
Hon'ble Mr. P.N. Kashalkar PRESIDING MEMBERHon'ble Mrs. S.P.Lale Member
PRESENT :VIKASH TAKALKAR , Advocate for the Appellant 1 Ms.Mangal Kadam,Advocate, for Ms.Smita Gaidhani, Advocate for the Respondent 1

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

On last date this appeal was dismissed for default and immediately on the same date in the afternoon this application for restoration of the appeal has been filed.  On hearing both the Counsels we are finding that appeal is required to be decided on merits.  On the same date appellant has filed restoration application.  This requires to be allowed in the interest of justice to decide the appeal on merits.  Hence, we pass the following order :-

               -: ORDER :-

1.   Application is allowed.  Appeal is restored back to file.

2.  Appeal No.171/2008 is taken up for admission hearing today itself.

PRONOUNCED :
Dated : 03 August 2010

[Hon'ble Mr. P.N. Kashalkar]PRESIDING MEMBER[Hon'ble Mrs. S.P.Lale]Member