Haryana

StateCommission

A/401/2017

PUNJAB AND SIND BANK - Complainant(s)

Versus

NARINDER KUMAR AGGARWAL - Opp.Party(s)

JAGDISH BECTOR

11 May 2018

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA

         

                                       

First Appeal No :     401 of 2017

Date of Institution:      06.04.2017

Date of Decision          :      11.05.2018 

  

Punjab and Sind Bank, Opposite Aggarsain College, S.V.M. Jagadhari, Tehsil Jagadhari, District Yamuna Nagar (Haryana).

                                      Appellant-Opposite Party

 

Versus

 

1.      Narinder Kumar Aggarwal aged 60 years son of Sh. Avadh Bihari Lal, resident of C-3/1095, Choriliyan Street, Jagadhari, District Yamuna Nagar.

 

2.      Amit Aggarwal aged about 35 years son of Sh. Raj Kumar, resident of C-3/1095, Choriliyan Street, Jagadhari, District Yamuna Nagar.

Respondents-Opposite Parties

 

 

CORAM              Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President.

                             Shri Balbir Singh, Judicial Member.

                            

                                                                            

Argued by :         Shri Jagdish Bector, Advocate for the appellant.

                             Shri Narinder Kumar Aggarwal-complainant in person and on behalf of Amit Aggarwal-complainant.

 

                                                   O R D E R

 

 

NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL)

 

          Punjab and Sind Bank-opposite party (for short, ‘bank’) has filed the present appeal against the order dated February 27^th, 2017 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Yamuna Nagar (for short, ‘District Forum’) whereby complaint filed by Narinder Kumar Aggarwal and Amit Aggarwal-complainants was allowed. The bank was directed to pay Rs.20,000/- compensation and Rs.5000/- litigation expenses to the complainant. 

2.      Today, that is, May 11^th, 2018 the complainants moved an application stating therein that the matter has been settled with the bank.  They do not want to claim the awarded amount, that is, Rs.20,000/- and Rs.5000/- from the bank. 

3.      In face of it, learned counsel for the appellant-bank has supported the statement of the complainants.    

4.      Since the matter has been settled between the parties and the complainants forego their claim, the impugned order is set aside.  The appeal stands disposed of accordingly.

5.      The statutory amount of Rs.12,500/- deposited at the time of filing the appeal be refunded to the appellant against proper receipt and identification in accordance with rules, after the expiry of period of appeal/revision, if any.

 

 

Announced 11.05.2018

(Balbir Singh) Judicial Member

(Nawab Singh) President

UK