Delhi

StateCommission

FA/516/2014

ASHWANI KUMAR KATYAL - Complainant(s)

Versus

NARAYANA COACHING CENTRE - Opp.Party(s)

17 Jul 2014

ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHI
Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
 
First Appeal No. FA/516/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District Central Delhi)
 
1. ASHWANI KUMAR KATYAL
C-117 FRIST FLOOR RAJENDER NAGAR NEW DELHI,110060
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. NARAYANA COACHING CENTRE
IIT ACADEMY A-1/171A , JANAKPURI NEW DELHI-110058
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

 

 

                      Date of Decision:  17.7.2014

FA-516/2014

 

 

Mr. Ashwani K. Katyal

S/o Shri K L Katyal,

R/o C-117, 1st Floor,

New Rajinder Nagar,

New Delhi

 

 

 

     .........Appellant

VS

 

 

 

Narayana Coaching Centre

Narayana IIT Academy,

A-1/171A, Janakpuri,

New Delhi

 

 

………...Respondent       

 

 

CORAM

SALMA NOOR, MEMBER                             

N P KAUSHIK, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

                         

1.   Whether reporters of local newspaper be allowed to see the judgment? 

2.   To be referred to the reporter or not?

 

N P Kaushik, Member (Judicial)

 

Present:         Appellant in person

1.         Heard on admission.  Appeal is directed against the order dated 31.3.2014 passed by the District Forum (Central), Kashmere Gate, Delhi.

2.         In brief, the son of the Appellant Shri Nishant Katyal was admitted to the respondent Academy for a crash course of AIEEE and paid Rs.13,000/-.  The course commended w.e.f. 27.3.2010.  The appellant vide his letter dated 27.3,2010 asked the respondent/OP to refund the amount paid.  An amount of Rs.10,000/- was refunded  by the respondent/OP academy on 28.3.2010 after retaining an amount of Rs.3,000/-.

3.         The complainant filed the complaint before the District Forum and prayed for refund of the amount of Rs.3,000/- and the amount of   Rs.98,000/-.  The District Forum observed that the appellant in question had withdrawn from the course without any fault on the part of the OP academy.  In his own letter dated 27.3.2010, the appellant did not allege that there was any deficiency on the part of the OP/respondent academy.  Amount of tax of Rs.844.44 and the study material of Rs.4,000/- were non refundable.  The receipt of payment of Rs.13,000/- to the respondent academy also reflects the amount of tax and study material,  referred to above. 

3.         We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the orders dated 22.8.2013 passed by the Ld. District Forum. 

4.         A copy of this order be provided to the parties free of costs and a copy of this order be also sent to concerned District Forum and thereafter file be consigned to record room.

 

 

 
 
[HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.