Madhya Pradesh

StateCommission

A/11/1124

UNION BANK OF INDIA - Complainant(s)

Versus

NANHE BHAI - Opp.Party(s)

SH. NARESH CHOURASIA

27 Mar 2019

ORDER

M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPAL

PLOT NO.76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL

                              

                                    FIRST APPEAL NO. 1124 OF 2011

(Arising out of order dated 23.12.2010 passed in C.C.No.151/2010 by the District Forum Sagar)

 

UNION BANK OF INDIA.                                                                                           …          APPELLANT.

 

Versus

                 

NANHE BHAI & ORS.                                                                                                …         RESPONDENTS.

 

BEFORE:

 

                  HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHANTANU S. KEMKAR    :      PRESIDENT

                  HON’BLE DR.  MRS MONIKA MALIK                           :      MEMBER               

 

                                      O R D E R

27.03.2019

 

          Shri H. R. Mutreja, learned counsel for the petitioner.

            Shri Yash Vidyarthi, learned counsel for the respondent no.1.

            Shri Ravindra Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent no.2.

            None for the respondent no.3.

 

As per Shri Justice Shantanu S. Kemkar :                       

                        Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 23.12.2010 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Sagar in C.C.No.151/2010, the appellant/opposite party no.1 has filed this appeal.

2.                     We find that the Forum has not properly appreciated the stand taken by the appellant bank to the effect that they are not liable to pay compensation as claimed by the complainant and the Forum has also not considered the documents on record and the other objections raised by the opposite parties indicating that some other co-operative bank was liable for compensation, if any, to be payable to complainant.

3.                     Having gone through the record we find that the impugned order is not sustainable as various grounds taken by the opposite party have not appreciated by the Forum as also the Forum has not considered the documents filed on record and passed the impugned order.

4.                     In the circumstances, we set-aside the impugned order and remand the case back to the District Forum for deciding the complaint afresh on merits in accordance with law. Parties are directed to appear before the Forum on 21.05.2019.

5.                     With the aforesaid observation, this appeal is disposed of.

 

            (Justice Shantanu S. Kemkar)            (Dr. Monika Malik)             

                     President                                         Member