West Bengal

StateCommission

RC/13/2010

Dr. Subodh Biswas. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Nanda Kishore Saha. - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Sujoy Mondal.

08 Mar 2010

ORDER


STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION , WEST BENGALBHAWANI BHAWAN (Gr. Floor), 31 Belvedere Road. Kolkata -700027
RC No. 13 of 2010
1. Dr. Subodh Biswas.S/O Late Sudhir Kumar Biswas. Vill- Ukilpara, Swaraj Basu Lane, PO & PS. Raiganj, Dist. Uttar Dinajpur. W.B. ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Nanda Kishore Saha.Nanda Kishore Saha. S/O late Nathuram Saha. Parnaogaon, PO. & PS. & Dist. Naogaon, Bangladesh, represented by their authorized Attorney, Sri Gobinda Saha. S/O Sri Gour Saha. Vill-Dakshin Akhanagar, PO & PS. Kaliaganj, Dist. Uttar Dinajpur. W.B.2. Manju Rani Saha. W/O Late Nathuram Saha. parnaogaon, PO &PS & Dist. Naogaon, Bangladesh, represented by their authorised Attorney, Sri Gobinda Saha. S/O Sri Gour Saha. Vill- Dakshin Akhanagar, PO & PS. Kaliaganj, Dist. Uttar Dinajpur. W.B.3. Sri Gobinda Saha. S/O Sri Gour Saha, Vill- Dakshin Akhanagar, PO & PS. Kaliaganj, Dist. Uttar Dinajpur. ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :Mr. Sujoy Mondal., Advocate for
For the Respondent :

Dated : 08 Mar 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

No. 1/08.03.2010.

 

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI A. CHAKRABARTI, PRESIDENT.

 

Heard Mr. Sujoy Mondal, the Ld. advocate for the Revision Petitioner.  The grievance of Mr. Mondal, the Ld. Advocate is in respect of Power of Attorney to consider whether Forum is having jurisdiction in view of the language used in the Power of Attorney.  As we are of the opinion that these aspects are to be decided at the time of final hearing of the complaint and are not jurisdictional issue until entire evidence is taken for consideration.  The revision petition is dismissed.  We make it clear that we have not decided any of the questions raised on merit.

 


MRS. SILPI MAJUMDER, MemberHON'BLE JUSTICE ALOKE CHAKRABARTI, PRESIDENT ,