Heard learned proxy counsel for the petitioner. Learned State Commission dismissed the appeal on account of absence of petitioner on 25-04-2012. It was observed in the order that inspite of uploading cause list on website; petitioner was not present so appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner had no notice of the date of 25-04-2012 so he could not appear before State Commission, hence impugned order be set aside and appeal be restored. As appeal has been dismissed in default on the basis of cause list, which was uploaded on website, we deem it appropriate to set aside the impugned order. It is expected from the State Commission that matter should not be dismissed in default on the basis of uploading on the website. Notice should be given to the parties before dismissal of the appeal, etc. Consequently, revision petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and impugned order dated 25-04-2012 passed by learned State Commission in Appeal No. 1049 of 1999 Sachdeva Transport vs. Naimuddin Shiekh is set aside and appeal is restored at its original number. As appeal is 14 years old, State Commission is directed to decide it on merits expeditiously after notice to the respondents. Petitioner is directed to appear before State Commission on 04-02-2014.