Haryana

Karnal

282/2014

Vishal Thareja S/o H.N. Thareja - Complainant(s)

Versus

Nagpal Sales Corporation - Opp.Party(s)

Neeraj Rohilla

23 Feb 2017

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.

                                                               Complaint No.282 of 2014

                                                               Date of instt.: 17.10.2014

                                                               Date of decision 23.2.2017  

Vishal Thareja son of Shri H.N.Thareja resident of house no.1882, sector-7 Urban Estate Karnal.                                                                         …………..Complainant.

                                                Versus

1. Nagpal Sales Corporation shop no.3, old Char Chaman Link Road, Urban Estate, Karnal through its proprietor.

2. M/s Bharti Enterprises, near Shafli Chicken Corner, Hospital Road Karnal through its proprietor Shri Atul.

3. M/s Samsung Customer Satisfaction 11nd floor, Tower-C, Vipul Tech Square, Sector 43, Golf Course Road, Gurgaon-122002.

.                                                                           ………… Opposite Parties.

                     Complaint u/s 12  of the Consumer Protection Act

 

Before:         Sh.K.C.Sharma……….President.

                   Sh.Anil Sharma…….Member.

Present:        Sh. Neeraj Rohila Advocate for the complainant.

                   Sh. Dheeraj Sachdeva Advocate for opposite parties no.2 and 3.

                   Opposite party no.1 exparte.

 

ORDER:

                   File taken up in Lok Adalat. The matter has been compromised between the parties amicably. The Learned counsel for the Opposite Parties no.2 and 3 made statement that opposite parties are ready to make the payment of depreciated amount of the mobile set of Rs.26,000/-  within 45 days, provided old mobile set alongwith accessories is deposited with the company.

               Thereafter, learned counsel for the complainant made statement that having regard to the statement of the learned counsel for the Opposite Parties, he is ready to deposit the accessories, whereas the mobile set is already in the custody of service centre. In view of that statement, he does not want to pursue with the present complaint.

2.                 In view of statement of both the parties, present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn having been compromised. However, both the parties shall be bound by their respective statements. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.   

Announced
Dated:23.2.2017

                                                                         (K.C.Sharma)

                                                                             President,

                                                                   District Consumer Disputes

                                                                    Redressal Forum, Karnal.

                             (Anil Sharma ) 

                                Member.