Maharashtra

StateCommission

RP/10/26

SUMAN MOTELS LTD - Complainant(s)

Versus

NAGESH SOPARKAR - Opp.Party(s)

N K DAYANADAN

27 Sep 2010

ORDER


BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL

COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
Revision Petition No. RP/10/26
(Arisen out of Order Dated 11/01/2010 in Case No. 39/2009 of District Mumbai)
1. SUMAN MOTELS LTDTEJ GAURAV HOUSE 109 TELANG ROAD 2 MATUNGA E MUMBAI Maharastra ...........Appellant(s)

Versus
1. NAGESH SOPARKAR R 353 RABALE MIDC NAVI MUMBAI 400701Maharastra2. KEDAR SOPARKARR-353, RABALE MIDC, NAVI MUMBAI3. KETAKI SOPARKARR-353, RABALE MIDC, NAVI MUMBAI ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE :
Hon'ble Mr.Justice S.B.Mhase PRESIDENTHon'ble Mr. P.N. Kashalkar Judicial MemberHon'ble Mrs. S.P.Lale Member
PRESENT :Mr.Nishi Soni,Advocate, Proxy for N K DAYANADAN , Advocate for for the Petitioner 1 U.B.WAVIKAR, Advocate for the Respondent 1

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Per Mr.Justice S.B.Mhase, Hon’ble President

Heard Mr.Nishi Soni-Advocate I/b.Mr.N.K.Dayanandan-Advocate for the petitioners.  Mr.U.B.Wavikar-Advocate for the respondents.

In these revision petitions it is brought to our notice that the complainants are having separate deposits for separate different periods. However, complaint is filed common.  Having now realized that separate complaints with separate delay condonation applications are necessary to be filed, advocate for the petitioner has filed an application seeking leave to withdraw complaints and seeks leave to file separate complaints in respect of each and every deposit along with the delay condonation application.  In the facts and circumstances involved in the case, we find that prayer is justified and, therefore, application submitted on 27/9/2010 seeking permission to withdraw complaints with liberty to file separate complaint along with delay condonation application is hereby granted.  Revision petition nos.26/10 to 29/10 stands disposed of.

 

 

 

 

 

 

PRONOUNCED :
Dated : 27 September 2010

[Hon'ble Mr.Justice S.B.Mhase]PRESIDENT[Hon'ble Mr. P.N. Kashalkar]Judicial Member[Hon'ble Mrs. S.P.Lale]Member