Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/379/2013

A.M. NARAYANAPPA - Complainant(s)

Versus

N. GOPALACHARI - Opp.Party(s)

K. VENKITESAN

16 Aug 2021

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
First Appeal No. FA/379/2013
( Date of Filing : 01 Apr 2013 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )
 
1. A.M. NARAYANAPPA
-
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. N. GOPALACHARI
NO. 556/165, SEETHARAM NAGAR, KRISHNAGIRI MAIN ROAD, HOSUR-635 109
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 16 Aug 2021
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                          BEFORE   Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE. R. SUBBIAH                  ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                             Tmt.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                            ::      MEMBER

 

FA. No. 379/2013

  (Against the order in C.C. No.106/2011, dated 7.9.2012 on the file of the DCDRC, Dharmapuri at Krishnagiri )

                                                                    DATED THE 16TH  DAY OF AUGUST 2021

 

A.M.Narayanappa,

S/o Muniswamappa,

Carpenter,

Alasanatham Road,

Alasanatham,

Hosur – 635 109                                                          ..Appellant

                                         Vs

Sri.N.Gopalachari,

S/o Nanjachari,

No.556/165, Seetharamnagar,

Krishnagiri Main Road,

Opp.to Suzuki show room,

Hosur – 635 109                                                         ..Respondent

 

Counsel for Appellant                      : M/s K.Venkatesan

Counsel for Respondent                  : M/s S.Vijayaraghavan

          This appeal coming on before us today, this Commission made the following order in open court :-

                                               Docket order

          No representation for appellant. Respondents present. The matter is posted to this date for appearance of both and for reporting settlement or for arguments or for dismissal. Written arguments of the appellant also not filed. Sufficient opportunities given. Today it is posted for appearance or for dismissal, but there is no representation for the appellant. Though passed over till 12.00 pm, and called twice, there is no representation for appellant. Appellant is also called absent, thereby showing that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Therefore no useful purpose will be served in keeping the appeal on file. Hence the appeal is dismissed for default. No cost.

           Sd/-                                                                                                              Sd/-

S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                                                                         R. SUBBIAH             

          MEMBER                                                                                                PRESIDENT

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.