Haryana

Karnal

CC/299/2019

Suryansh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Myntra - Opp.Party(s)

Swati Tiwana

13 Sep 2019

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.

                                                                       Complaint no.299 of 2019

                                                                    Date of instt.: 24.05.2019        

                                                                     Date of Decision 13.09.2019

Suryansh son of Parveen Mohan r/o House no.596 , U.E. Sector-13, Karnal.                                                                                                    ………Complainant.

                                              Versus  

1. Myntra, 3^rd floor, A Block, AKAR Tech Park, 7^th mile, Krishna Reddy Industrial Area, Kudlu gate, Bangalore-5600068, Karnantaka through their Proprietor/Manager/Authorized signatory.

2. Shreyas Retail Pvt. Ltd. Unit no.102, 1^st floor, Second Landing, A-285, Main Building Pitambar Marg, Defence Colony, New Delhi-110024, Delhi-110049

            ………Opposite parties.

 

                   Complaint under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.

 

Before      Sh. Jaswant Singh…….President

                 Sh.Vineet Kaushik…….Member.

                  Dr. Rekha Chaudhary….Member

 

Present:  Ms. Swati Tiwana Advocate for complainant.

                 None for OP no.1.

                 Shri Vikas Sharma Advocate for OP no.2.

 

                 File taken up today in pre Lok Adalat on the application moved by the learned counsel of complainant. Power of attorney on behalf of OP no.2 filed. Learned counsel of complainant suffered a statement that company is ready to pay Rs.2500/- in toto with regard to complaint of complainant within 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of order in the present complaint.

             On the other hand, learned counsel of complainant suffered a statement that in view of statement of learned counsel of OP no.2, she withdraw her complaint as the matter has been compromised between the parties amicably. Statement of both the learned counsel of the parties recorded separately.      

                In view of statement made by the learned counsel of both the parties, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn being compromised. Both the parties shall be bound by the statement made by their respective counsel. File consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Announced
Dated:13.09.2019

                                                                                      President,

                                                                      District Consumer Disputes

                                                                      Redressal Forum, Karnal.

 

                   (Vineet Kaushik)                (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary)

                         Member                                     Member