Haryana

Karnal

CC/425/2019

Pardeep Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Myntra - Opp.Party(s)

Swati Tiwana

13 Sep 2019

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.

                                                                       Complaint no.425 of 2019

                                                                       Date of instt.: 15.07.2019                       

                                                                       Date of Decision 13.09.2019

Pardeep Kumar son of Shamsher Singh, resident of House no.172, Sector-6, Karnal.

                                                                             ………Complainant.

                                              Versus  

1. Myntra, 3^rd floor, A Block, AKAR Tech Park, 7^th mile, Krishna Reddy Industrial Area, Kudlu gate, Bangalore-5600068, Karnantaka through their Proprietor/Manager/Authorized signatory.

2. Sane Retails Private Limited, SCO 136, 1^st floor, Sector-5, MDC, Panchkula Haryana 134114, Panchkula, Haryana-134109.

            ………Opposite parties.

                   Complaint under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.

 

Before      Sh. Jaswant Singh…….President

                 Sh.Vineet Kaushik…….Member.

                  Dr. Rekha Chaudhary….Member

 

Present:  Ms. Swati Tiwana Advocate for complainant.

                 Shri Rohit Kumar Advocate for OP no.1

                 Shri Vikas Sharma Advocate for OP no.2.

 

                 Memo of appearance on behalf of OP no.1 filed. Today the case is fixed for compromise in Lok Adalat. Learned counsel of complainant suffered a statement that company is ready to pay Rs.2500/- in toto with regard to complaint of complainant within 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of order in the present complaint.

             On the other hand, learned counsel of complainant suffered a statement that in view of statement of learned counsel of OP no.2, she withdraw her complaint as the matter has been compromised between the parties amicably. Statement of both the learned counsel of the parties recorded separately.      

                In view of statement made by the learned counsel of both the parties, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn being compromised. Both the parties shall be bound by the statement made by their respective counsel. File consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Announced
Dated:13.09.2019

                                                                                      President,

                                                                      District Consumer Disputes

                                                                      Redressal Forum, Karnal.

 

                   (Vineet Kaushik)                (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary)

                         Member                                     Member