Punjab

Moga

CC/87/2019

Meena Bansal - Complainant(s)

Versus

Myntra - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Shubham Bansal

14 Jan 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLEX,
ROOM NOS. B209-B214, BEAS BLOCK, MOGA
 
Complaint Case No. CC/87/2019
( Date of Filing : 24 Sep 2019 )
 
1. Meena Bansal
w/o Shiv Bansal, r/o H.No. 347, Rajendra Estate, Moga
Moga
Punjab
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Myntra
3rd Floor, AKR Tech Park, 7th Mile, krishna Reddy Industrial Area, Kudlu Gate, Bangalore-560068, Karnataka, India through Authorized signatory
Bangalore
Karnataka
2. Bagzone Lifestyles Pvt. Ltd
C/o Tainwala Holdings Pvt. Ltd, 401 Ackruti Star, Andheri (E) Mumbai-40093, through Authorized Signatory.
Mumbai
Maharastra
3. VIP INDUSTRIES LIMITED
VIP Industries Limited, 78-A, MIDC Estate, Nashik-422007 through Authorized Signatory.
Nashik
Maharastra
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Sh.Amrinder Singh Sidhu PRESIDENT
  Sh. Mohinder Singh Brar MEMBER
  Smt. Aparana Kundi MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 Sh.Amit Goyal/Sh.Barinder pal Singh, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
Dated : 14 Jan 2022
Final Order / Judgement

Dated: 14.01.2022.

Present:

For the Complainant:    None

For Opposite Party        No.1 Sh.Amit Goyal, Advocate.

For Opposite Party No.2: Sh.Barinder Pal Singh, Advocate.

For Opposite Party No.3: Exparte.

 

          None has come present on behalf of the complainant despite repeated calls. The case be called again after lunch.

 

(Aparana Kundi)          (Mohinder Singh Brar)        (Amrinder Singh Sidhu)

                 Member                                  Member                                  President

 

Again case called after lunch,  but none has come present on behalf of complainant nor evidence of the complainant  present. Perusal of the record shows that none has come present on behalf of the complainant from the last 5 hearings and  in the interest of justice, the case was being adjourned and thereafter,  vide order 03.12.2011 of this  District Consumer Commission, the written  intimation was also sent to the complainant to pursue the matter which was duly received by Sh.Shiv Bansal husband of the complainant  on 10.12.2021. But despite receipt of intimation, none has come present on behalf of the complainant. It presumes that the complainant is not interested in prosecuting her case. It is 4.00 PM. Hence, the complaint is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. File be consigned to record room after compliance.

Announced in open Commission.

Dated: 14.01.2022. 

 
 
[ Sh.Amrinder Singh Sidhu]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Sh. Mohinder Singh Brar]
MEMBER
 
 
[ Smt. Aparana Kundi]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.