Haryana

Karnal

CC/155/2024

Sachin - Complainant(s)

Versus

Myntra Designs Private Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Aniket Khurana

04 Apr 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                                    Complaint No.155 of 2024

                                                                     Date of instt.19.03.2024

                                                                     Date of Decision:04.04.2024

 

Sachin son of Sh. Ranbir Singh C/o Chamber No.521, Mini Secretariat, Sector-12, Karnal.

                                                                                      …….Complainant.

                                                Versus

  1. Myntra Designs Pvt., Ltd., SY No.8 to 14 and 55, Alyssa Begonia Clover Embassy Tech Village, Outer Ring road, Devarbisanahalli Varthur Hobli, Bengaluru, Urban Karnataka-560103, Bengaluru, Karnataka.
  2. Ekart Logistics, MX7M+F6C, Sector-3, Karnal.

                                                                                      …..Opposite Parties.

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before       Sh. Jaswant Singh………President.   

                   Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                   Dr. Suman Singh……..Member.

 

Present: None for the complainant.

 

(Dr. Suman Singh Member)

                 

Today the case is fixed for consideration on the point of admissibility.

The complainant has filed the present complaint under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 against the opposite parties (hereinafter referred to as OPs) on the averments that on 26.02.2024 complainant had placed an order for “Voyage Unisex Grey Lens & While Wayfarer Sunglasses with UV Protected Lends” the complainant immediately applied for refund the cost of said wrong product, but OPs did not refund the same. Hence, this complaint.

   None has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. Position remained the same on the adjourned date. As per Section 36 (2) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, the admissibility of the complaint is ordinarily be decided within twenty one days from the date on which the complaint was filed. The present complaint has been filed on 19.03.2024 and twenty one days is going to be expired.

                Hence, it appears that complainant is no more interested to pursue the complaint. Thus, in view of the above, the complaint is deserves to dismissed and same is hereby dismissed inlimine. However, complainant is at liberty to file a fresh complaint on placing the proof, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced
Dated:04.04.2024.                

                    President,

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Suman Singh) 

    Member                    Member         

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.