Kerala

Kottayam

CC/229/2021

Philip Jose - Complainant(s)

Versus

Muthoot Housing Finance Company - Opp.Party(s)

17 May 2023

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kottayam
Kottayam
 
Complaint Case No. CC/229/2021
( Date of Filing : 04 Oct 2021 )
 
1. Philip Jose
Parayil House, Kadanadu, Meenachil Poovarani Kottayam.
Kottayam
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Muthoot Housing Finance Company
Represented by Authorised Officer/Chief Manager, Door No.IX/964-B, Ist floor, Palm Plaza, YMCA Lane, Shastri Road, Kottayam-686001
Kottayam
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 17 May 2023
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOTTAYAM

Dated, the 18th day of May, 2023

 

Present:  Sri. Manulal V.S. President

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member

 

C C No. 229/2021  (Filed on 04-10-2021)

 

Petitioner                                  :         Philip Jose,

                                                          S/o. P.P. Jose,

                                                          Parayil House,

                                                          Kadanadu, Meenachil

                                                          Poovarani village,

                                                          Kottayam - 686020

                                                                    Vs.   

Opposite party                          :         Muthoot Housing Finance Company

                                                          Ltd.  Rep. by the Authorised Officer/

                                                          Chief Manager,  Door No. IX/694-B

                                                          1st Floor, Palm Plaza,  YMCA Lane

                                                          Shastri Road, Kottayam – 686001

                                                      (Adv. Yazer Ahammed and Adv. Sabu S)                 

                                                O  R  D  E  R

Sri. Manulal V.S. President

          Complainant present.  Opposite party represented.  Complainant filed a memo stating that he is not interested to further proceed with the complaint as the matter is amicably settled among the parties.  Hence the complaint is disposed as not pressed.

          Pronounced in the Open Commission on this the 18th day of May, 2023

Sri. Manulal V.S. President             Sd/-

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member                  Sd/-

                                                                                      By Order

 

                                                                             Assistant Registrar

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.