Circuit Bench Nagpur

StateCommission

RP/09/80

VIJAY TIKARAM BAGDE - Complainant(s)

Versus

MURLIDHAR DHAMANLAL KATIYARI 2.MRS RAMABAI MURLIDHAR KATIYARI 3. RAMCHANDRA DHAMANMAL KATIYARI - Opp.Party(s)

ADV S D DESHPANDE

26 Apr 2011

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR
5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1
CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001
 
Revision Petition No. RP/09/78
(Arisen out of Order Dated 02/05/2009 in Case No. 08/30 of District )
 
1. VIJAY TIKARAM BAGDE
C/O ADV BHENDE,NEW SHUKRAWARI NEAR RAM COOLER NAGPUR
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SMT MAMTA AMRASINGH GURUSINGHNI
R/O VITTHAL WARD ARVI TAH DIST WARDHA
2. JIVAN VIKAS NAGRI PAT SANSTHA MARYADIT THROUGH ADMINISTRARTO
MAIN ROAD DR.KARALE MARG ARVI
WARDHA
3. NARENDRA BAJIRAO GAWAI
GURUNANAK DHARAM SHALA RAM NAGAR ARVI
DIST WARDHA
...........Respondent(s)
Revision Petition No. RP/09/79
(Arisen out of Order Dated 02/05/2009 in Case No. 08/34 of District )
 
1. VIJAY TIKARAM BAGDE
C/O ADV BHENDE,NEW SHUKRAWARI NEAR RAM COOLER NAGPUR
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. 1.RAVI DAYRAM LALWANI 2.SMT RAMABAI MURLIDHAR KATIYARI
R/O. RAM NAGAR ARVI TAH ARVI DIST WARDHA
2. RAJKUMAR TOLARM SALWANI
JARIPATKA NAGPUR
3. RAJANI MOHANLAL SALWANI
JARIPATKA NAGPUR
4. JIVAN VIKAS NAGRI PAT SANSTHA MARYADIT
MAIN ROAD DR KARALE MARG ARVI
WARDHA
5. NARENDRA BAJIRAO GAWAI
GURUNANAK DHARAMSHALA RAMNAGAR ARVI
WARDHA
...........Respondent(s)
Revision Petition No. RP/09/80
(Arisen out of Order Dated 02/05/2009 in Case No. 08/33 of District )
 
1. VIJAY TIKARAM BAGDE
C/O ADV BHENDE,NEW SHUKRAWARI NEAR RAM COOLER NAGPUR
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. MURLIDHAR DHAMANLAL KATIYARI 2.MRS RAMABAI MURLIDHAR KATIYARI 3. RAMCHANDRA DHAMANMAL KATIYARI
R/O. RAM NAGAR ARVI TAH ARVI DIST WARDHA
2. JIVAN VIKAS NAGARI PAT SANSTHA MARYADIT
MAIN ROAD DR.KARALE MARG ARVI TAH ARVI DIST WARDHA
3. NARENDRA BAJIRAO GAWAI
GURUNANAK DHARAM SHALA RAMNAGAR ARVI
WARDHA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  HON'BLE P.N.KASHALKAR PRESIDING MEMBER
  HON'BLE SMT.JAYSHREE YENGAL MEMBER
 
PRESENT:ADV S P DESHPANDE, Advocate for the Petitioner 1
 
ORDER

PER SHRI. P.N.KASHALKAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER

Since the revision is not permissible against the award passed by the District Forum, we are inclined to dismiss all the three revisions. In fact, the Revisionist should have filed appeal U/s 15 of the Consumer Protection Act,1986. When appeal is provided, Revision Petition can not be entertained. Hence all the three Revision Petitions are dismissed.

No order as to cost.

      Inform the parties accordingly.

 

 

Delivered on 26/04/2011.

 

 
 
[ HON'BLE P.N.KASHALKAR]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[ HON'BLE SMT.JAYSHREE YENGAL]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.