NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/2123/2012

KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY - Complainant(s)

Versus

MUNNEY KHAN - Opp.Party(s)

MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

09 Jul 2012

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 2123 OF 2012
 
(Against the Order dated 25/07/2011 in Appeal No. 687/2000 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)
1. KANPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
THROUGH ITS VICE- CHAIRMEN,MOTIJHEEL, KANPUR
-
UTTAR PRADESH
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. MUNNEY KHAN
R/O.54/3,JUHI SAFED COLONY
KANPUR NAGAR
URRAR PRADESH
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. VINAY KUMAR, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :
Mr. Abhishek Chaudhary, Advocate with
Mr. Garvesh Kabra, Advocate
For the Respondent :
Mr. A. Hassan &
Mr. Abrar Ahmad, Advocates (Caveator)

Dated : 09 Jul 2012
ORDER

Counsel for the parties heard.  There is a delay of 219 days.  Counsel for the parties heard on the point of delay.  This matter was dismissed by the State Commission on 25.07.2011 in default.  The petitioner was under the impression that it can be restored by the State Commission therefore, an application for restoration was moved by the petitioner on 11.08.2011, which is still pending.  However, the counsel for the petitioner states before this Commission that he would withdraw the same on the next date of hearing.  Since thereafter, the Supreme Court authority came, which clearly stated that the State Commission has no power to restore the same.  Therefore, the petitioner appeared before this Commission.  Consequently, the delay stands satisfactorily explained. 

Keeping in view all the facts and circumstances, we hereby allow the application, condone the delay and restore the matter before the State Commission subject to the petitioner paying cost of Rs. 5000/- half of which will go to the respondent and half will be deposited with the Consumer Legal Aid Account of this Commission. 

Parties are directed to appear before the State Commission on 16.08.2012.  The State Commission is directed to decide the case on merits after satisfying that the cost has been paid.

Order be given dasti to both the parties at 5.00 P.M.

 

 

 
......................J
J.M. MALIK
PRESIDING MEMBER
......................
VINAY KUMAR
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.