Haryana

Ambala

CC/66/2023

SHYAM SUNDER GULATI. - Complainant(s)

Versus

MUNICIPAL CORPORTAION (MPROVEMENT TRUST CELL). - Opp.Party(s)

AMAN BAWA,ADV.

26 Feb 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
AMBALA
 
Complaint Case No. CC/66/2023
( Date of Filing : 15 Feb 2023 )
 
1. SHYAM SUNDER GULATI.
H.NO 129,VIKAS VIHAR ,AMBALA CITY HARYANA.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. MUNICIPAL CORPORTAION (MPROVEMENT TRUST CELL).
AMBALA THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  NEENA SANDHU PRESIDENT
  MS.RUBY SHARMA MEMBER
  MR. VINOD KUMAR SHARMA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
None for the complainant
......for the Complainant
 
Shri Arun Kumar Batra, Advocate, counsel for the OP. (Defence of OP struck off).
......for the Opp. Party
Dated : 26 Feb 2024
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AMBALA.

 

                                                          Complaint case no.          :      66 of 2023.

                                                          Date of Institution          :      15.02.2023.

                                                          Date of decision     :                 26.02.2024.

 

 

Shyam Sunder Gulati aged about 51 years, R/o House No.129, Vikas Vihar, Ambala City, Haryana.

 

          ……. Complainant.

 

                                                Versus

 

     Municipal Corporation (Improvement Trust Cell) Ambala through its Commissioner (Ambala City).

 

                                                                                                                                      ….…. Opposite Party.         

Before:        Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.

                   Smt. Ruby Sharma, Member

                   Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma, Member            

                            

Present:       None for the complainant.

                   Shri Arun Kumar Batra, Advocate, counsel for the OP. (Defence of  OP struck off). 

 

          Complaint under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019

 

Order by:-  Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.

 

          Today, the case was fixed for leading evidence by the complainant, subject to deposit of cost of Rs.800/-, in the legal aid account of this Commission, but none has appeared on behalf of the complainant. From the perusal of zimni orders, it is revealed that several opportunities have been taken by the complainant to deposit the cost and to lead evidence. Case called several times since morning, but neither the complainant nor anybody else on his behalf has appeared before this Commission to deposit the cost and to lead evidence. Even from the last two dates of hearing i.e. 04.01.2024 and 23.01.2024, none appeared on behalf of the complainant to deposit the cost and to lead evidence. It appears that the complainant is not interested to pursue the present complaint. Accordingly, the present complaint is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Certified copy of the order be sent to the parties free of costs as per rules. File be indexed and consigned to record room.

Pronounced: 26.02.2024

 

          Member                         Member                                                                       President

                                                                            DCDRC, Ambala

 

 

 
 
[ NEENA SANDHU]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ MS.RUBY SHARMA]
MEMBER
 
 
[ MR. VINOD KUMAR SHARMA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.