Maharashtra

DCF, South Mumbai

CC/17/166

VINCENT D'SOUZA - Complainant(s)

Versus

MUMBAI G P O - Opp.Party(s)

13 Sep 2017

ORDER

SOUTH MUMBAI DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SOUTH MUMBAI
Puravatha Bhavan, 1st Floor, General Nagesh Marg, Near Mahatma Gandhi Hospital
Parel, Mumbai-400 012
 
Complaint Case No. CC/17/166
 
1. VINCENT D'SOUZA
PEARL COLONY A 5 1ST FLOOR NEAR ST PAUL S CHURCH DR AMBEDKR ROAD DADAR EAST MUMBAI 400014
MUMBAI
Maharashtra
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. MUMBAI G P O
DEPARTMENT OF POSTS INDIA THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR PH & PG COMPLAINT SECTION FORT MUMBAI 400001
MUMBAI 400001
MAHARASHTRA
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. G.K. RATHOD PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. S.R. SANAP MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 13 Sep 2017
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE SOUTH MUMBAI  DISTRICT  CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,

Puravatha Bhavan, 1st Floor, General Nagesh Marg, Near Mahatma Gandhi Hospital, Opp. M.D. College, Parel, Mumbai – 400 012.

                                                                         O.No.

 

Complaint No.SMF/MUM/CC/17/166

   Date of filing :  04/09/2017                                                                                                     

                                                                           Date of Order:  13/09/2017

                                                         

Vincent D’souza,

Pearl Colony,  A/5,  First Floor,

Near St. Paul’s Church,

Dr. Ambedkar Road,

Dadar (East),

Mumbai – 400 014.                                                      ….. Complainant.

          V/s.

Mumbai G.P.O.,

Department Of Posts, India,

Through its Director (PH & PG),

Complaint Section, Fort,

Mumbai – 400 001.                                                       ….. Opposite Party

 

                    Coram:

 

Shri. G.K. Rathod                :   Hon’ble President

Shri. S.R. Sanap                   :   Hon’ble Member

 

Appearance:  Complainant –  In person

O R D E R

 

PER SHRI. G.K. RATHOD – HON’BLE  PRESIDENT

 

   Heard Complainant.  Considering the contents of complaint, it appears that Complainant has not given  proper address to the Opponent,  therefore, the Opponent reported unknown.  Hence return.  It is not appears any deficiency in  service or unfair  trade practice.  We do not  find any substance to admit the case.  Hence this complaint is dismissed.  

     sd/-xxx                                                                      sd/-xxx                

          (Shri. S.R. Sanap)                                             (Shri.G.K. Rathod)

          Hon’ble  Member                                                  Hon’ble President

 

Note:-  As the pleadings, affidavit, documents, are in English the order in the proceeding is passed for the better knowledge of the parties in English.

 

vns

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. G.K. RATHOD]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. S.R. SANAP]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.