BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION :HYDERABAD
F.A.No.1686/2007
Between:
B.Krishnamurthy, S/o.late Pullaiah,
Hindu, aged 69 years, Senior Citizen,
D.No.4-7/1-79, B-Block,
Tuda Apartments,I.S.Mahal Road,
Tirupati – 517 507.
1.MultiSuperSpecialtyDentalHospital,
Rep. by its Proprietor Dr.M.Manohar,
No.90,Theerthakatta Street, Tirupati.
2. Dr.K.Manohar , BDS, FAGH FCOPFRSH,London,
TTDHospital
Theerthakatta Street, Tirupati.
Counsel for the Appellant
Counsel for the Respondent Indus
CORAM: SMT. M.SHREESHA, HON’BLE MEMBER,
AND
SRI K.SATYANAND, HON’BLE MEMBER.
THURSDAY, THE
TWO THOUSAND TEN.
Oral Order (Per
****
Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.17/2007
Partha DentalHospital SwarnaENTSuperSpecialtyHospital, Tirupati on 27.9.2006 and as her condition deteriorated, she was admitted in SVIMS CMCHospital negligence of the doctor by extracting the teeth without conducting necessary tests and taking proper precautions
no.2 referred
the serial number of the cash receipt th ”. There are sufficient grounds to believe that ParthaDentalHospital reported in (2008) 2 SCC 1 wherein it is held as follows:
(i)
(ii) adequate information and at the same time avoid the possibility of
In view of the afore mentioned judgement it is clear that the law lays down that an informed consent had to be taken from the patient prior to any surgery performed. ParthaDentalHospital ’ There was no X-ray prescribed done by the opposite parties and the expert doctor has opined that the doctor had not taken any precautions
In Bolam v.FriernHospital
Keeping in view the entire material on record and the arguments put forward
|
[HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA] |
PRESIDING MEMBER |