Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/1686/07

B.KRISHANAMURTHY - Complainant(s)

Versus

MULTI SUPER SPECIALTY DENTAL HOSPITAL - Opp.Party(s)

SMT. I.MAAMU VANI

21 Jan 2010

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/1686/07
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District East Godwari-II at Rajahmundry)
 
1. B.KRISHANAMURTHY
D.NO.4-7/1-79 B-BLOCK TUDA APTS I.S.MAHAL ROAD TIRUPATI-07
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. MULTI SUPER SPECIALTY DENTAL HOSPITAL
DR.M.MANOHAR NO.90 THEERTHAKATTA STREET TIRUPATI
Andhra Pradesh
2. DR.K.MANOHAR
HONORARY DENTAL SURGEON TTD HOSPITAL AND SVIMS 90 THEERTHAKATTA STREET TIRUPATI
CHITTOOR
Andhra Pradesh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA PRESIDING MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION :HYDERABAD

 

F.A.No.1686/2007         

 

Between:

B.Krishnamurthy, S/o.late Pullaiah,

Hindu, aged 69 years, Senior Citizen,

D.No.4-7/1-79, B-Block,

Tuda Apartments,I.S.Mahal Road,

Tirupati – 517 507.                                                                      

1.MultiSuperSpecialtyDentalHospital,

Rep. by its Proprietor Dr.M.Manohar,

No.90,Theerthakatta Street, Tirupati.

 

2. Dr.K.Manohar , BDS, FAGH FCOPFRSH,London,

   TTDHospital

    Theerthakatta Street, Tirupati.                                                                                                                        

Counsel for the Appellant     

 

Counsel for the Respondent    Indus

 

 

CORAM: SMT. M.SHREESHA, HON’BLE MEMBER,

AND

SRI K.SATYANAND, HON’BLE MEMBER.

 

THURSDAY, THE  

TWO THOUSAND TEN.

 

Oral Order (Per 

****

 

           Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.17/2007  

                                     Partha DentalHospital   SwarnaENTSuperSpecialtyHospital, Tirupati on 27.9.2006            and as her condition deteriorated, she was admitted in SVIMS      CMCHospital       negligence of the doctor by extracting the teeth without conducting necessary tests and taking proper precautions    

 

                  

             

 

        

 

         

 

                      

                      no.2 referred                                        

 

              the serial number of the cash receipt                             th          ”. There are sufficient grounds to believe that  ParthaDentalHospital                    reported in (2008) 2 SCC 1 wherein it is held as follows:          

(i)      

 

(ii)              adequate information and at the same time avoid the possibility of 

 

In view of the afore mentioned judgement it is clear that the law lays down that an informed consent had to be taken from the patient prior to any surgery performed. ParthaDentalHospital    There was no X-ray prescribed done by the opposite parties and the expert doctor has opined that the doctor had not taken any precautions         

In Bolam v.FriernHospital

            

Keeping in view the entire material on record and the arguments put forward       

 

        

                                                                

                                                                                                                              

       

 
[HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA]
PRESIDING MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.