View 654 Cases Against Immigration
M/s.K.Senthil Kumar filed a consumer case on 11 Dec 2018 against M/s.Worldwide Immigration Consultancy Service Ltd in the South Chennai Consumer Court. The case no is CC/159/2016 and the judgment uploaded on 26 Mar 2019.
Date of Filing : 18.05.2016 Date of Order : 11.12.2018
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)
@ 2ND Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3.
PRESENT: THIRU. M. MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B, M.L. : PRESIDENT
TMT. K. AMALA, M.A., L.L.B. : MEMBER-I
TR. R. BASKARKUMARAVEL, B.Sc., L.L.M., BPT., PGDCLP., : MEMBER-II
C.C. No.159/2016
DATED THIS TUESDAY THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2018
Mr. K. Senthilkumar,
S/o. S. Kaliamurthy,
Flat No.9 A, 2nd Floor,
Block -2A, DABC Orchid Apartments,
No.30, Polachery Main Road,
Polachery,
Chennai - 600 127. .. Complainant.
..Versus..
1. M/s. Worldwide Immigration Consultancy Services Ltd.,
Head Office:-
SCO 2415-16, Sader-22-C,
Chandigarh -160 022.
2. M/s. Worldwide Immigration Consultancy Services Ltd.,
Reg. Office:-
No.A-31/A, 3rd Floor,
Near Raja Garden Flyover,
Above Yamaha Showroom,
Ring Road, Rajouri Garden,
New Delhi,
India.
3. M/s. Worldwide Immigration Consultancy Services Ltd.,
Corporate Office:-
No.A-12, Industrial Area, Phase VI,
Mohali.
4. M/s. Worldwide Immigration Consultancy Services Ltd.,
No.29, 1st Floor, Venkat Raman Street,
Dr. Nair Road, Behind Vani Mahal,
T. Nagar,
Chennai.
5. M/s. Global Strategic Business Consultancy,
FZCO: Office No.315-3016, West Wing-3,
Dubai Airport Free Zone,
Dubai (UAE). .. Opposite parties.
Counsel for the complainant : M/s. Arunachalam & others
Counsel for the opposite parties 1 to 5 : S. Suresh & others
ORDER
THIRU. M. MONY, PRESIDENT
This complaint has been filed by the complainant against the opposite parties under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 praying to pay a sum of Rs.65,000/- and Rs.1,01,124/- with interest at the rate of 18% p.a. from 19.01.2015 to till the date of realization, to pay a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- towards compensation for mental agony, unfair trade practice, deficiency in service and to pay a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- towards compensation for the delay in refunding with cost to the complainant.
.
Memo filed and recorded. In view of the Memo, this case is dismissed as withdrawn.
MEMBER-I MEMBER-I I PRESIDENT
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.