Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

CC/1/2015

M/s.R.Vasumathi - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.Vodafone, Rep by Mr.Harsha Murthy - Opp.Party(s)

Party in Person

04 Dec 2017

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,
CHENNAI (SOUTH)
 
Complaint Case No. CC/1/2015
 
1. M/s.R.Vasumathi
Thoralpakkam, Chennai 97.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s.Vodafone, Rep by Mr.Harsha Murthy
MRC Nagar, Chnennai-28.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  M.MONY.,B.Sc.,L.L.B.,M.L., PRESIDENT
  Dr.Paul Rajasekaran.,M.A.,D.MIN,HRDI,AIII,BCS MEMBER
  K.AMALA., M.A., L.L.B., MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 04 Dec 2017
Final Order / Judgement

                                                                        Date of Filing :   31.10.2014

                                                                        Date of Order :   04.12.2017

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)

     2nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

PRESENT: THIRU. M.MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B. M.L.,                     : PRESIDENT            

                  TMT. K.AMALA, M.A. L.L.B.,                                 : MEMBER I

             DR. T.PAUL RAJASEKARAN, M.A ,D.Min.PGDHRDI, AIII,BCS : MEMBER II

C.C.NO.1/2015

     MONDAY THIS  4TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017

R. Vasumathi,

No.S1, Plot No.44,

Naveetha apartment,

MCN Nagar 2nd Street,

Thoraipakkam,

Chennai 600 097.                                  .. Complainant

                                        ..Vs..

Vodafone,

Rep. by Mr. Harsha Murthy,

AVP – Customer Service,

Vodafone South Limited,

Tower 1, 9th Floor, Beliclaa Towers,

Block94, MRC Nagar,

Chennai 600 028, India.                      .. Opposite party

 

Counsel for Complainant            :    Party in person   

Counsel for opposite party          :   M/s. A. Palaniappan

ORDER

THIRU. M. MONY, PRESIDENT

          This complaint has been filed by the complainant against the opposite party under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 seeking direction to pay a sum of to pay a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- as compensation for mental agony and to pay cost of the complaint.

        Amendment of Cause Title not carried out by the complainant for long time.  Amended copy of complaint also not filed for long time.  Complainant called absent for long time.  Hence this complaint is dismissed for default.  No cost.

       

MEMBER-I                        MEMBER-II                             PRESIDENT.

 
 
[ M.MONY.,B.Sc.,L.L.B.,M.L.,]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Dr.Paul Rajasekaran.,M.A.,D.MIN,HRDI,AIII,BCS]
MEMBER
 
[ K.AMALA., M.A., L.L.B.,]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.