Subhau Kumar filed a consumer case on 06 Sep 2022 against M/s.Vijay Shanthi Builders Ltd in the South Chennai Consumer Court. The case no is CC/216/2016 and the judgment uploaded on 23 Jan 2023.
Date of Complaint Filed : 18.04.2016
Date of Reservation : 08.08.2022
Date of Order : 06.09.2022
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
CHENNAI (SOUTH), CHENNAI-3.
PRESENT: TMT. B. JIJAA, M.L., : PRESIDENT
THIRU. T.R. SIVAKUMHAR, B.A., B.L., : MEMBER I
THIRU. S. NANDAGOPALAN., B.Sc., MBA., : MEMBER II
CONSUMER COMPLAINT No.216 /2016
TUESDAY, THE 6th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022
Subhav Kumar,
Son of M.Mahaveer,
Represented by his father and power agent,
Mr.M.Mahaveer,
No.3/1, Subba Reddy Street,
West Mambalam,
Chennai - 600 033. ... Complainant
..Vs..
M/s.Vijay Shanthi Builders Ltd.,
Rep. by its Managing Director,
Having its Office at No.20/43,
Kasthuri Rangan Street,
Alwarpet,
Chennai - 600 018. ... Opposite Party
******
Counsel for the Complainant : M/s. G.Dilip Kumar
Counsel for the Opposite Party : M/s. R.Parthasarathy
On perusal of records and after having heard the oral arguments of the Counsel for the Opposite Party, we delivered the following:
ORDER
Pronounced by the President Tmt. B. Jijaa, M.L.,
1. The Complainant has filed this complaint as against the Opposite Party under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and prays to pay the compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- towards the mental agony and hardship suffered by the Complainant and to hand over the keys of his flat after rectifying the defects to the Complainant along with cost.
2. The averments of Complaint in brief are as follows:-
The Complainant purchased a Flat in Tower IV, 1stFloor-Flat E situated in the “Lotus Pond” Project of Opposite Party at Kelambakkam, Chennai – 603 103 upon execution of a Construction Agreement dated 05.04.2010 and Sale Deed dated 12.07.2010 vide document No.4918/2010. He has paid the entire sale consideration to the Opposite Party through Bank loan availed from Citi Union Bank, T. Nagar branch. The Opposite Party handed over the possession of the Flat with keys on 18.06.2013 and after inspection of the said flat the Complainant complained about the incomplete inner work on the same day in writing, which the Opposite Party promised to rectify at the earliest. The keys of the said flat were taken back by the Opposite Party for carrying out the incomplete work. Since no intimation was received from the Opposite Party the Complainant issued a legal notice dated 05.03.2014 which was received by the Opposite Party. On 09.09.2014 the Opposite Party demanded the second set of keys of the flat for rectifying the defects as the first set of keys of his flat has been stolen. The Opposite Party did not rectify the defects and hence a legal notice dated 20.11.2015 was issued by the Complainant to the Opposite Party. The Opposite Party issued a reply dated 01.02.2016 for which the Complainant issued rejoinder letter dated 04.02.2016. The act of the Opposite Party, who failed and neglected to rectify the defects and handover the keys of the Flat to him is nothing but deficiency in service which the Opposite Party is really bound to compensate. Hence the complaint.
3. Written Version filed by the Opposite Party in brief is as follows:-
The Complainant had purchased a flat measuring 1155 sq.ft, Flat “E” in the project called “Lotus Pond” at Kelambakkam, Kanchipuram District and the Complainant had taken possession of the said flat on 20.04.2013. The Complainant had filed the complaint in the year 2016 which is beyond the period of 2 years and hence barred by limitation. By virtue of the Tripartite Agreement dated 05.04.2010 wherein as per clause 27 it was specifically agreed that the parties to the contract shall refer the matter to arbitration in case of any dispute hence the dispute is arbitrable. The Complainant had failed to comply the payment schedule as mentioned in the Tripartite Agreement dated 05.04.2010 inspite of various reminders to the Complainant for the stage wise payment. The Opposite Party had agreed to construct the apartment within 12 months with a grace period of 3 months from the date of receipt of all the necessary approval and permits from the competent authorities. The Complainant had taken possession of the flat on 20.04.2013 and after due physical inspection and he acknowledged his satisfaction in his affidavit on 20.04.2013 and further confirmed that there was no pending work of construction within his knowledge and agreed to undertake any other work on his own cost. On 27.04.2016 the Complainant contacted the Opposite Party to complete the works inside his flat and accordingly he handed over a set of key to the Opposite Party. The Complainant did not take back the keys from the Opposite Party after completion of work and has choosen this complaint with ulterior motive. Hence the complaint is to be dismissed.
4. The Complainant submitted his Proof Affidavit and Written Arguments. On the side of the Complainant, documents were marked as Ex.A-1 to Ex.A-11. The Opposite Party submitted his Proof Affidavit and Written Arguments. On the side of the Opposite Party
documents were marked as Ex.B-1 to Ex.B-56.
5. Points for Consideration
1. Whether there is deficiency in service on the part of the Opposite Party?
2. Whether the Complainant is entitled for reliefs claimed?
3. To what other reliefs the Complainant is entitled to?
Point No.1
The undisputed facts are that the Opposite Party had entered into a Tripartite Agreement on 05.04.2010 with the Vendor and Complainant for the construction and development of residential apartments comprising 23 Blocks under the name of “Lotus Pond” project located at 48, IT High way, Thaiyur Village, Kelambakkam, Chennai. The Complainant had purchased a Flat measuring 1155 Sq.ft of built up area in T-4, F1 – E, situated in the “Lotus Pond” Project for a valuable sale consideration along with the undivided share of land measuring 437.54 sq.ft on 12.07.2010 as found in Ex.A1 and Ex.A2. The Complainant had taken possession of the flat on 20.04.2013, as per the possession letter dated 20.04.2013, Ex.B-5 pursuant to which the Complainant had executed an affidavit dated 20.04.2013, Ex.B-10 confirming that there was no pending work of construction and acknowledging his satisfaction after due inspection of the flat.
The dispute arose when the Complainant had taken over possession of the flat. According to the Complainant he had taken possession of Flat on 18.06.2013 and after inspection of the said flat the Complainant, complained about the incomplete inner work to the Opposite Party, who promised to rectify the same. Though the Opposite Party had taken back the keys they had not completed the defective works and returned the keys to the Complainant.
The contention of the Opposite Party is that the Complainant had made an initial payment of Rs.50,000/- during the booking of the said flat on 16.01.2009 and the next installment payment of Rs.10,00,000/- on 25.03.2010 and there after he failed to comply the payment as per the schedule of the Tripartite Agreement dated 05.04.2010. The Opposite Party had sent various reminders to the Complainant for stage wise payment, the Complainant paid his final payment only on 19.04.2013. The Complainant had sought for modification in his apartment through letter dated 16.10.2010, Ex.B-18. The Opposite Party completed the Complainant’s additional works and handed over the Flat to the Complainant in time.
On careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case it is evident that the Complainant had taken possession of the flat on 20.04.2013 as per Ex.B-10, however according to the Complainant he had taken possession of Flat on 18.06.2013 . Though the Complainant contends that the Opposite Party had not rectified the defects which amounts to deficiency in service, the Complainant had approached the Arbitral Tribunal for the same reliefs. In respect of the same grievance the Lotus Pond Residential Welfare Association through its President had initiated arbitration proceedings in O.P No.241/2015 in Arbitration Case No.21/2015 and an Arbitral Award was passed by the Sole Arbitrator on 01.12.2017 granting certain reliefs. Once the arbitration clause was invoked by a party to resolve certain disputes and an Arbitral Award came to be passed then the parties cannot proceed before this Commission in respect of the same relief based on the same cause of action. The association of flat owners in which the Complainant is one of the members had invoked the arbitration clause in the Construction Agreement and an arbitrator was appointed and an Arbitral Award was passed on 01.12.2017 granting some reliefs based on the deficiency in service on the part of the Opposite Party in the matter of non provision of certain amenities and on failure to perform certain acts as promised in the Construction Agreement, this Commission is of the considered view that the relief sought for is based on the same cause of action based on deficiency in service of the Opposite Party that was already decided by the Arbitral Tribunal this complaint is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, Point No.1 is answered against the Complainant.
Point No.2 and 3:
As discussed and decided Point No.1 against the Complainant, the Complainant is not entitled for the reliefs claimed in the complaint and for any other reliefs. Accordingly, Point Nos.2 and 3 are answered.
In the result the Complaint is dismissed. No costs.
Dictated to Steno-Typist, transcribed and typed by her, corrected and pronounced by us in the Open Commission, on 6th of September 2022.
S. NANDAGOPALAN T.R. SIVAKUMHAR B.JIJAA
MEMBER II MEMBER I PRESIDENT
List of documents filed on the side of the Complainant:-
Ex.A1 | 05.04.2010 | Tripartite Agreement for Construction |
Ex.A2 | 12.07.2010 | Sale Deed Doc No.4918/2010 |
Ex.A3 | 30.05.2015 | Specific Power of Attorney |
Ex.A4 | 18.06.2013 | Acknowledgement for receiving keys
to rectify the defects by the representative
of the opposite party
|
Ex.A5 | 05.03.2014 | Lawyer Notice to the opposite party
|
Ex.A6 | 06.03.2014 | Acknowledgement card
|
Ex.A7 | 09.09.2014 | Acknowledgement for receiving second set of keys by the representative of
the opposite party
|
Ex.A8 Ex.8a | 20.11.2015 28.11.2015 | Lawyer Notice to the opposite party
Acknowledgement card
|
Ex.A9 | 01.02.2016 | Reply Notice sent by the opposite party |
Ex.A10 | 04.02.2016 | Rejoinder Notice to the Opposite Party |
Ex.A11 | 09.02.2016 | Acknowledgement card
|
List of documents filed on the side of the Opposite Party:-
Ex.B1 | - | General Power Attorney |
Ex.B2 | - | Tri Partite Agreement
|
Ex.B3 | - | Sale Deed
|
Ex.B4 | 20.04.2013 | Site Engineer letter for handing over key to
complainant
|
Ex.B5 | 20.04.2013 | Final Payment and key handing over letter to complainant
|
Ex.B6 | 20.04.2013 | Original Sale deed handing over letter to complainant |
Ex.B7 | - | Customer feed back form
|
Ex.B8 | 20.04.2013 | EB Card Acknowledgement made by complainant |
Ex.B9 | 20.04.2013 | Sale Deed Acknowledgement made by complainant
|
Ex.B10 | 20.04.2013 | Affidavit of complainant |
Ex.B11 | 22.01.2013 | Bank's Provisional Sanction letter to complainant |
Ex.B12 | 22.06.2011 | Opposite Parties Non-Mortgage letter to SBI and confirmation letter |
Ex.B13 | 21.09.2010 | Opposite Parties Original EC certificate letter to complainant and Loan processing correspondences |
Ex.B14 | - |
|
Ex.B15 | - |
|
Ex.B16 | 25.05.2010 | Extra Work Balcony & Window Grill letter to complainant |
Ex.B17 | 16.08.2010 | Modification deadline letter to complainant |
Ex.B18 | 16.10.2010 | Extra Work Request letter from complainant to Opposite Party
|
Ex.B19 | 06.02.2011 | Extra Work Estimate letter from complainant
|
Ex.B20 | 06.09.2011 | Opposite Parties Break and Proceed letter to Project Manger
|
Ex.B21 | - | Modification Plan Diagram & Modification details |
Ex.B22 | 17.09.2011 | Modification confirmation letter to complainant |
Ex.B23 | 14.12.2010 | Opposite Parties letter to complainant for confirmation of modification
|
Ex.B24 | 28.12.2010 | Modification & Extra work letter to
Project Manager from Opposite Party
|
Ex.B25 | - | Modification Plan and Extra work cost Extra Work Details and Site Plan Phase & 1
|
Ex.B26 | - | Extra work details and site plan phase 1 & 1 |
Ex.B27 | 25.10.2011 | Name Board confirmation letter to complainant |
Ex.B28 | 13.04.2010 | Tri Partite agreement sign & return letter to Complainant |
Ex.B29 | 04.10.2010 | EB form |
Ex.B30 | 20.07.2010 | Photocopy of sale deed |
Ex.B31 | 12.08.2009 | Parent document letter |
Ex.B32 | 01.06.2009 | Status approval letter to Complainant |
Ex.B33 | 04.05.2009 | Housing loan processing letter & Form 16, Form 128A |
Ex.B34 | - | Contact details |
Ex.B35 | 06.03.2013 | Opposite Parties Payment reminder letter to complainant
|
Ex.B36 | 05.02.2013 | Payment reminder letter
|
Ex.B37 | 08.11.2012 | Final Bill Payment reminder letter |
Ex.B38 | 22.09.2012 | Final Bill Payment reminder letter |
Ex.B39 | 25.02.2012 | Final Bill Payment reminder letter |
Ex.B40 | 07.11.2011 | Final Bill Payment reminder letter – Interest chargeable |
Ex.B41 | 26.05.2011 | Payment reminder letter
|
Ex.B42 | 21.04.2011 | Final Bill Payment reminder letter
|
Ex.B43 | 30.09.2010 | Stage wise Payment letter
|
Ex.B44 | 08.09.2010 | Stage wise Payment letter
|
Ex.B45 | 10.08.2010 | Payment schedule |
Ex.B46 | 13.01.2010 | Work progress letter |
Ex.B47 | 15.10.2009 | Approval copy letter and Payment due reminder letter |
Ex.B48 | 01.04.2009 | Intimation of work progress and Payment due reminder letter
|
Ex.B49 | 20.04.2013 | Receipt Rs.19,91,783/- & copy of Cheque
|
Ex.B50 | 25.03.2010 | Receipt Rs.10,00,000/- |
Ex.B51 | 24.03.2010 | Payment letter from Mahaveer to Opposite Party
|
Ex.B52 | 16.01.2009 | Copy of cheque |
Ex.B53 | 21.04.2014 | Access card letter to Complainant |
Ex.B54 | 30.04.2013 | Car park allotment letter signed by Opposite Party to Complainant |
Ex.B55 | 22.04.2013 | Car Park Allotment letter to complainant
22.4.13,3.12.2010, 7.1.2010, 27.1.2010
|
Ex.B56 | - | Site Plan & Basement Plan |
S. NANDAGOPALAN T.R. SIVAKUMHAR B.JIJAA
MEMBER II MEMBER I PRESIDENT
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.