Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

CC/460/2015

Karthik C.Kotadia - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.VGN Developers Pvt - Opp.Party(s)

A.Muniraja

20 Feb 2019

ORDER

                                                                                Date of Filing  : 18.11.2015                                                                    

                                                                                Date of Order  : 20.02.2019

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)

@ 2^ND Floor, T.N.P.S.C. Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3.

 

PRESENT: THIRU. M. MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B, M.L.                           : PRESIDENT

       TR. R. BASKARKUMARAVEL, B.Sc., L.L.M., BPT., PGDCLP., : MEMBER-II

 

C.C. No.460/2015

DATED THIS WEDNESDAY THE 20^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019

Karthik C. Kotadia,

S/o. Mr. V. Chandrasekar Kotadia,

Flat No.3A, Block 6,

Asvini Amarisa,

No.77, Kalasthamman Koil Street,

Ramapuram,

Chennai – 600 089.                                                  .. Complainant.

..Versus..

     

1. M/s. VGN Developers Private Limited,

Represented by its Managing Director,

No.43/14, Hameedia Center,

III Floor, Haddows Road,

Nungambakkam,

Chennai – 600 006.       

 

2. Mr. K. Manivannan,

Authorised Signatory,

M/s. VGN Developers Private Limited,

No.43/14, Hameedia Center,

III Floor, Haddows Road,

Nungambakam,

Chennai – 600 006.                                             .. Opposite parties.

 

 

Counsel for the complainant                 : M/s. A. Muniraja & another

 

Counsel for the opposite parties 1 & 2 : M/s. K. Harishankar &

                                                                 others

 

 

ORDER

THIRU. M. MONY, PRESIDENT

 

This complaint has been filed by the complainant against the opposite parties under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 praying to complete the constructions work fully, to rectify the defects in the flat, to replace flooring with the ceramic tiles in the specified size of 18 x 18” inches as per the agreement to pay a sum of Rs.1,20,000/- for the loss rental income for 15 month at the rate of Rs.8,000/- per month from October 2013 to March 2015 and to pay a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- towards compensation for deficiency in service, mental agony, inconvenience and hardship caused to the complainant with cost.

Proof Affidavit of both complainant and 2^nd opposite party were not filed for a long time to prove the allegations raised in the complaint and contentions raised in the written version.  Both complainant, 2^nd opposite party and their Counsels absent for a long time.   Hence, this complaint is dismissed for default.

Dated this Wednesday the 20^th Day of February 2019.

 

 

MEMBER-II                                                              PRESIDENT