Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

CC/150/2015

M/s.P.Fatima - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.United India Insurance Co Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

N.L.Gladys Priya

30 Oct 2017

ORDER

                                                                        Date of Filing :   10.03.2015

                                                                        Date of Order :   30.10.2017

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)

     2nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

PRESENT: THIRU. M.MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B. M.L.,                     : PRESIDENT            

                  TMT. K.AMALA, M.A. L.L.B.,                                 : MEMBER I

             DR. T.PAUL RAJASEKARAN, M.A ,D.Min.PGDHRDI, AIII,BCS : MEMBER II

C.C.NO.150/2015

     MONDAY THIS  30TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017

Mrs. P. Fatima,

W/o. Late Mr.N.Lawrence,

Door No.16, 2nd Main Road,

Ram Nagar,

Peravallur, Chennai 600 082.                         .. Complainant

                                        ..Vs..

1.  United India Insurance Co. Ltd.,

Rep. by its Manager,

No.24, Whites Road,

Chennai 600 014.

 

2. H.O. Heritage Mumbai,

Heritage Health TPA Pvt. Ltd.,

Rep. by its Manager,

Elite Auto House, 54-A, Ground Floor,

Next to Crisil House,

Anderi-Kurla Road, Chakala,

Mumbai 400 093.

 

3. Cox & Kings,

Rep. by its Manager,

Arcot Road, No.3,

Near Big Mega Mart,

Alwarthirunagar,

Chennai 600 087.                                      .. Opposite parties

 

Counsel for Complainant                    :  M/s. N.L.Gladys Priya & another    

Counsel for opposite party-1              :  M/s. R.Ravichandran

Counsel for the opposite party 2         :  Exparte.

Counsel for the opposite party-3        :  M/s. Prasahanth Rajagopal Prem

 

 

 

 

ORDER

THIRU. M. MONY, PRESIDENT

          This complaint has been filed by the complainant against the opposite parties under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 seeking direction to repay the amount of Rs.13,500/- with interest and also to pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- towards deficiency in service and mental agony and to pay cost of the complaint.

 

         Proof affidavit of complainant not filed for long time.  Even after repeated last chances and No further adjournments.   The complainant counsel also called absent.  Hence proof affidavit of complainant is closed.  Since the complainant has not filed proof affidavit to prove the complaint;  This complaint is dismissed for default.  No costs.

 

MEMBER-I                        MEMBER-II                             PRESIDENT.

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.