Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

CC/365/2015

M/s.Padmaraj Thelaprolu - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.TATA Enterprises - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.K.Ramanatha Reddy

01 Aug 2017

ORDER

                                                                        Date of Filing :   18.08.2015

                                                                        Date of Order :   01.08.2017

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)

     2^nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

PRESENT: THIRU. M.MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B. M.L.,                     : PRESIDENT            

                  TMT. K.AMALA, M.A. L.L.B.,                                 : MEMBER I

             DR. T.PAUL RAJASEKARAN, M.A ,D.Min.PGDHRDI, AIII,BCS : MEMBER II

C.C.NO.365/2015

   TUESDAY THIS  1^ST   DAY OF AUGUST 2017

Padmaja Thelaprolu,

W/o. T.G.S.Babu,

No.3-D, AUM Apartments,

No.32, Kothari Road,

Nungambakkam,

Chennai – 34.                                                         .. Complainant

                                        ..Vs..

 

1. M/s. Tata Enterprises,

(Infinite Retail Limited (Croma)),

Rep. by its Manager,

Kences, Towers, Ground Floor,

No.1, Ramakrishna Street,

North Usman Road,

T.Nagar, Chennai – 17.

 

2. M/s. Tata Enterprises (Croma),

(Infinite Retail Limited (Croma)),

Rep. by its Managing Director,

Regd Office – Bombay House,

24, Homi Mody Street,

Mumbai (Maharashtra).

 

3. Capital First Ltd.,

Rep. by its General Manager,

No.13, Meenakshi Towers,

Rajamannar Street, G.N. Chetty Road,

Chennai – 17.

 

4. Capital First Ltd.,

Rep. by its Managing Director,

India Butts Finance Centre, Tower II,

15^th Floor, Senapati Bapat  Marg,

Elphinstone Road (W), Mumbai 400 001.

(Maharashtra)                                                            .. Opposite parties

 

Counsel for Complainant               :   M/s. K. Ramanatha Reddy & another   

Counsel for opposite parties 1 to 2 :   Exparte  

Counsel for opposite party-4         :   Dismissed.

ORDER

THIRU. M. MONY, PRESIDENT

          This complaint has been filed by the complainant against the opposite parties under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 seeking direction to pay a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- as compensation for mental agony and damages,  and also to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- as cost of the complaint.

        Both counsels for complainant and the opposite parties jointly filed Memo stating that “the matter is settled out of Forum.   Hence the Memo is recorded.  In view of the Memo this complaint is dismissed as settled out of Forum.  No costs.

 

MEMBER-I                        MEMBER-II                             PRESIDENT.