Kerala

Palakkad

CC/48/2016

K.V.Krishnankutty - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.Surendra Indane Gas Agency - Opp.Party(s)

16 Jul 2016

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PALAKKAD
Near District Panchayath Office, Palakkad - 678 001, Kerala
 
Complaint Case No. CC/48/2016
 
1. K.V.Krishnankutty
S/o.Madhavikutty Varasyar, Kanthalloor Variyam, Sreekrishnapuram Post, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad - 679513
Palakkad
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M/s.Surendra Indane Gas Agency
Sreekrishnapuram, Sreekrishnapuram Post, Ottapalam Taluk, Palakkad - 679513
Palakkad
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Shiny.P.R. PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Suma.K.P MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. V.P.Anantha Narayanan MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 16 Jul 2016
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PALAKKAD

Dated this the 16th  day of July  2016 

Present  : Smt.Shiny.P.R,  President

             :  Smt.Suma.K.P, Member

             : Sri. V.P.Anantha Narayanan, Member       Date of Filing : 04/04/2016

 

      CC/48/2016

 

K.V.Krishnankutty,                                                  :        Complainant   

S/o.Madhavaikutty Varasyar,

Kanthalloor Variyam,

Sreekrishnapuram Post,

Ottapalam Taluk  - 679 513

Palakkad

(By Adv.K.K.Sreenivasan)

  Vs

         

M/s.Surendra Indane Gas Agency,

Sreekrishnapuram,

Sreekrishnapuram Post,

Ottapalam Taluk,

Palakkad – 679 513                                                  :          Opposite party

(By Adv.S.Vinod)

 

                                                      O R D E R

 

By Smt.Shiny.P.R, President

Complainant has a domestic gas connection with opposite party and his consumer No. is 4002. Complainant was regularly booking gas, but opposite party did not supply the gas to the complainant properly. Complainant submitted that only after filing complaint to the higher authority, opposite party supplied the gas to the complainant. This practice was continued for a long time. 

 

On 24.07.2014 as per booking No.205236, complainant has booked gas, but not supplied. Then on  10.09.2014 complaint was filed by complainant and on 11/09/2014 gas was supplied.

On 24/09/2014 as per booking No.216589, complainant has booked for gas, but not supplied. Then on 23/10/2014 complaint was filed by the complainant and on 24/10/2014 gas was supplied. On 15/11/2014 as per booking No.225402, complainant has booked for gas, but not supplied. Then on 1/12/2014 complaint was filed by the complainant and on 02/12/2014 gas was supplied.

On 18/01/2015 as per booking No.236835, complainant had booked for gas and supplied only on 10/03/2015. On 31/07/2015 and 19/09/2015 complainant has booked for gas, but not supplied. A message received from the opposite party stating that booking is cancelled. No reasons were shown.

Opposite party is not supplying the gas to the customers considering the seniority of the booking. Opposite party is supplying the gas as per their whims and fancies. They are not following any procedures, rules or regulations of the Indian Oil Corporation for supplying the gas to its customer. Complainant further submitted that from the enquiry, he understood that, opposite party sold the gas for extra money to their interested customers. This irregular supply of gas caused much mental agony and financial loss to the complainant.

          Complainant filed complaint before the Chairman IOC on 18/5/2015. But no reply was sent so far and no actions were taken so far. The act of opposite party caused much losses and damages to the complainant. Hence, complainant prays for  an order directing opposite party to pay Rs.50,000/- with 12% interest to the complainant and allow such other reliefs which are deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice.

          Complaint was admitted and notice was issued. After receiving the notice, opposite party filed vakkalath. But no version was filed.

Evidence adduced by the complainant consists of his chief affidavit and Ext.A1 series to A4 series. 

The following issues are taken into consideration

  1. Whether there is any deficiency in service on the part of opposite party?
  2. If so what is the relief?

Issues 1 and 2

We have perused the documents filed before the Forum. Documents filed before the forum revealed the fact that there were some delay in supplying the gas cylinders which were booked on 24-7-2014 and 24-9-2014 to the complainant. Complainant also submitted that bookings on the dates of 31-7-2015 and 19-9-2015 were cancelled without any reason. Inordinate delay in supplying  of gas cylinder and cancellation of gas booking without any reason amount to deficiency in service on the part of opposite party. These acts of opposite party will definitely cause mental agony and financial loss to the complainant. Hence the opposite party has the liability to pay the compensation to the complainant for their deficient service. As the opposite party did not adduce any evidence, the evidence tendered by the complainant stands unchallenged.    

 In the light of the above discussions, we are of the view that there is deficiency in service on the part of opposite party. Hence we direct opposite party to pay  Rs.4000/- (Rupees Four thousand only) towards compensation for mental agony along with cost of Rs.1500/- (Rupees One thousand five hundred only) to the complainant.

Order shall be complied with within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the order, failing which complainant is eligible for 9% interest per annum for the whole amount from the date of order, till realization.   

Pronounced in the open court on this the  16th  day of  July  2016.

                                                                                                                                Sd/-

                                                                                                                           Shiny.P.R.

                      President   

 

                            Sd/-

                      Suma.K.P.

                      Member

 

                          Sd/-

      V.P.Ananatha Narayanan      

                      Member

Witness examined on the side of complainant

 

Ext.A1series  – Photocopy of letter dated 18/5/15 issued by the complainant to

                      Chairman, IOC with postal receipt and acknowledgement card

Ext.A2 series – Photocopy of letter dated 24/2/2015issued by the complainant to

                      Chairman, IOC with postal receipt and acknowledgement card      

Ext.A3 (1) & (2) series – Photocopy of letter dated 28/3/2016 issued by complainant to

                                    the Surendra Indane, Sreekrishnapuram alongwith

                                    acknowledgement card and postal receipt

Ext.A4 (1) and (2) -  Photocopy of letter dated 11/5/2016 issued by complainant to

                              The Surendra Indane, Sreekrishnapuram alongwith

                              acknowledgement card and postal receipt     

 

                                                                                               Forwarded by/By order

 

 

                                                                                                         Senior Superintendent

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Shiny.P.R.]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Suma.K.P]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. V.P.Anantha Narayanan]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.