Tamil Nadu

North Chennai

CC/126/2018

R.Ganesan - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.Sterling tree magnum India Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.N.Chandra Raj

28 Feb 2020

ORDER

                                                                      

                                                                        Complaint Presented on:  03.05.2002

                                                                                 Date of disposal:  30.05.2022

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI (NORTH)

@ 2ND Floor, T.N.P.S.C. Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003.

 

PRESENT : THIRU. G. VINOBHA, M.A., B.L.,                          :PRESIDENT

                                  TMT. KAVITHA KANNAN, M.E.,                         : MEMBER-I

                                  THIRU.V.RAMAMURTHY,B.A.,B.L.,PGDLA.,   :MEMBER-II

 

MONDAY THE 30th  DAY OF MAY 2022

C.C.NO.126/2018

 

 

R.Ganesan

No.8, 2nd street, Bharathi nagar,

Pallavaram, Chennai-600 043.

                                                                                          …..Complainant

 ..Vs..

M/s.Sterling Tree Magnum (India) Ltd.

Represented by Managing Director,

No.5, 41st street, 6th Avenue,

Ashok Nagar, Chennai-600 083.

 

 

                                                                                                                                 .....Opposite Party.

 

 

 

Counsel for Complainant                          : M/s. N.Chandra Raj.

Counsel for Opposite party                         : M/s.G.Sundaram & A.Philip Nicholas

 

ORDER

 

BY PRESIDENT THIRU. G.VINOBHA, M.A.,B.L.,

          This complaint is filed by the complainant u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.1986.

          The complainant filed this complaint  against the opposite party  to direct the opposite party to pay to the complainant a sum of Rs.79,875/- towards his investment in TEAKQUITY scheme a sum of Rs.70,875/- towards the interim return payable ix year, i.e. on 30.08.2001; a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- as compensation for the defective and deficient services rendered to him and for the mental agony suffered by him; and a sum of Rs.1000/- towards the cost of the notice and in all a total sum of Rs.2,51,750/- along with an interest of 24% p.a. from 01.09.2001 till its settlement in full and cost of the complaint.

          Complainant absent. Complainant counsel absent.  After filing memo on 22.11.2002 by opposite party.  Stating proceeding of company Application No.4074408-99 by order dated.29.04.1999.  Thereafter no further progress or order copy is furnished by either parties.  Matter pending for long time no progress.  Even after notice nobody appeared.  Hence this complaint is closed.

          Order Pronounced dated 30th  May 2022.

 

MEMBER – I              MEMBER – II                                   PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.