M/s.Srinivasan filed a consumer case on 10 Feb 2020 against M/s.Star Health and Allied Insurance Co Ltd in the North Chennai Consumer Court. The case no is CC/08/2016 and the judgment uploaded on 10 Mar 2020.
Complaint presented on: 29.12.2015
Order pronounced on: 10.02.2020
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (NORTH)
2nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3
PRESENT: TMT.K.LAKSHMIKANTHAM, B.Sc., B.L., DTL.,DCL, DL & AL - PRESIDENT
TMT.P.V.JEYANTHI B.A., MEMBER - I
MONDAY THE 10th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020
C.C.NO.08/2016
Mr.S.Srinivasan,
Flat No.5A,F2, Harini Flats,
First Street, Arunachalam Nagar,
Porur, Karambakkam,
Chennai – 600 116.
…..Complainant
..Vs..
1.Star Health and Allied Insurance Co.Ltd.,
Represented by its Authorized Signatory,
No.1, New Tank Street,
Valluvarkottam High Road,
Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.
2. Star Health and Allied Insurance Co.Ltd.,
Represented by its Authorized Signatory,
KRM Centre, VI Floor,
No.02, Harrington Road, Chetpet,
Chennai – 600 031.
| .....Opposite Parties
|
|
Counsel for Complainant : M/s.M.Mohan Kumar, S.Manjula,
G.Srinivasan
Counsel for opposite parties : Mr.N.Vijayaraghavan,
M.B.Raghavan
ORDER
BY PRESIDENT TMT.K.LAKSHMIKANTHAM, B.Sc., B.L., DTL.,DCL, DL & AL
This complaint is filed by the complainant u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.1986.
1.THE COMPLAINT IN BRIEF:
On 26th December 2011, complainant applied for insurance for his father Mr.Subramania Bharathi, aged about 68 years the medical insurance policy “Senior Citizens Red Carpet Insurance Policy” .The 1st opposite party approved the policy on 27th December 2011 and issued the policy certificate to the complainant bearing policy No.P/700001/01/2012/007085 for a sum assure Rs.3,00,000/- on payment of the insurance premium amount of Rs.14,229/- per annum commencing from 26th December 2011 to midnight of 25th December 2012. On 13th January 2015, the insured person was admitted in Sri Ramachandra Medical Centre for complaints of Right Leg Ulcer. The complainant has spent a sum of Rs.33,582.53/- towards pre-hospitalization bills, Rs.25,350.38/- towards post hospitalization bills, Rs.4,848/- towards pharmacy bills and Rs.710/- towards test reports dated 15th , 16th, 17th & 21st January 2015, respectively. All totally amounting to a sum of Rs.64,490.91/-. The opposite parties approved a preliminary amount of Sri Ramachandra Medical Centre denying the request for authorization for cashless treatment of the insured person. The complainant caused a legal notice dated 18th May 2015 to the opposite parties. Hence this complaint.
2. WRITTEN VERSION OF THE OPPOSITE PARTIES IN BRIEF:
Based on the treatment records the 2nd opposite party approved a preliminary amount of Rs.20,000/- towards treatment of the complainant’s father for “Carbuncle Right LL”. The medical panel of the opposite party on scrutinizing the medical records found that the patient was a known case of epilepsy for 30 years and Chronic Kidney Disease known case of psychotic illness and on Olazepine and nitrazepam which was not disclosed at the time of inception of policy. Hence the cashless authorization was denied and the same was communicated to the treating hospital and insured by letter dated 19.01.2015.The complaint may be dismissed.
3. POINTS FOR CONSIDERATION:
1. Whether there is deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties?
2. Whether the complainant is entitled to any relief? If so to what extent?
4. POINT NO :1
The complainant had availed Senior citizen Red carpet Insurance Policy No.P/700001/01/2012/007085 for the period from 26.12.2011 to 25.12.2012 for a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- covering his father with the opposite parties and it was renewed periodically for the term commencing from 26.12.2014 till 25.12.2015. Insurance premium was Rs.14,229/- per annum The complainant’s father was admitted in Sri Ramachandra Medical Centre for complaints of right leg ulcer and as per the complaint, the complainant spent a total amount of Rs.64,490.91/-. The opposite parties have approved Rs.20,000/- as a preliminary amount on 14.01.2015. Ex.A1 to Ex.A4 and Ex.A11 to Ex.A13, Ex.A15, Ex.A16, Ex.A18 and A22 are record of the hospital with respect to the Complainant’s treatment and Ex.A5,Ex.A14,Ex.A17 and Ex.A21 are the discharge summaries from the hospital. Insurance policies from 22.11.2012 to 10.11.2014 are Ex.A6 to Ex.A9. Insurance policies are not disputed. Preliminary amount for cashless treatment of Rs.20,000/- was permitted under Ex.A10 for the diagnosis namely “Carbuncle Right LL-Surgical management”.
05. On 19.01.2015 under Ex.A19 queries on pre-authorisation was sent to the hospital and after the receipt of communication with respect to the quries 2nd opposite party had denied the pre-authorisation for cashless treatment vide its letter in Ex.A20. Patient got discharged on 21.01.2015 and the discharge summary is Ex.A21. Then claim form was submitted by the complainant on 22.01.2015 for the paid amount of Rs.64,490.91 to the hospital vide Ex.A23 for reimbursement. On 24.01.2015 and on 27.01.2015 there was a corresponding letter sent by the 2nd opposite party in Ex.A24 & Ex.A25 requesting the complainant to send the documents mentioned in the above said letters. First reminder under Ex.A26 was issued to the complainant on 12.02.2015 by the 2nd opposite party for the earlier request. Ex.A27 is the letter of repudiation of claim by grievances department of opposite parties. Ex.A28 is the final reminder sent by the opposite parties again for submission of the requested records. Ex.A29 is the letter sent by the opposite parties to the complainant by drawing the attention of the complainant on the point of decision of cancellation of policy on grounds of non-disclosure of material fact or non-cooperation by the insured person. Ex.A30 is the letter sent by the opposite parties intimating the closure of the reimbursement claim and Ex.A31 is the cancellation of the policy Ex.A32 is cancellation of the policy. Ex.A33 is the legal notice from complainant, Ex.A34 is the reply from opposite parties.
06. Repudiation of claim by opposite parties is based on non-disclosure of the existing previous disease at the inception of policy. The discharge summary of Sri Ramachandra Medical centre dated 08.08.2011 vide Ex.A5 which is submitted by the complainant at the request of the opposite parties reveals that insured patient has the past known history of Chronic Kidney Disease (for the past one year) and known case of psychotic illness and an olazepine and nitrazepam. But at the time of inception of policy, i.e. 0n 26.12.2011 the complainant did not disclose Chronic Kidney Disease and psychotic illness in the proposal form in Ex.B2. Insurance Policy with terms and conditions are marked is Ex.B3.
Condition 7 of the policy reads as:
“If there is any misrepresentation/nondisclosure of material facts whether by the insured person or any other acting on his behalf, the company is not liable to make any payment in respect of any claim”.
07. On perusal of records it is noticed that the insured/complainant had not disclosed the above said illness on the date of inception of policy and also not furnished the bills for the hospitalization of the complainant’s father discharge summary and investigation reports even after the repeated reminders/letters for processing the claim. Even though those documents are filed before this forum no proof is shown by the complainant to have submitted the same before the opposite parties. No other disease is shown in the form by the complainant during the time of availing policy except diabetes. Hence the policy would have been issued in good faith by the opposite parties based on the representation and disclosure made by the complainant .
08. As per condition 13 of the policy non-disclosure of material fact or non-cooperation by the insured person in submitting the essential records as and when called for by the Insurer resulted in cancellation of the policy.
Condition 13 of the policy reads as:
“The company may cancel this policy on the grounds of non-disclosure of material fact or non-co-operation by the insured person by ending the insured 30 days notice by registered letter at the insured person’s last known address.”
As per the above stated condition the Insurance company by their letter dated 06.03.2015 under Ex.B6 sent a notice for cancellation and also refunded the premium on pro-rata basis for the remaining period of policy by way of DD 131470 dated 08.04.2015 for a sum of Rs 10,126/- to the complainant. Under these circumstances the complainant has no locus standi to file the complaint also. Therefore this forum is of the view that there is no deficiency on the part of opposite parties and point No1 is answered accordingly.
09. POINT NO.2:
As discussed in point no.1, there is no deficiency in service on the part of opposite parties and the complainant had undergone the mental agony and stress cannot be accepted. The complainant is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly it is dismissed. No costs.
In the result, this complaint is dismissed. No costs.
Dictated to the Steno-Typist transcribed and typed by her corrected and pronounced by us on this 10th day of February 2020.
MEMBER – I PRESIDENT
LIST OF DOCUMENTS FILED BY THE COMPLAINANT:
Ex.A1 dated 28.07.2011 CT Scan Brain
Ex.A2 dated 28.07.2011 Report form for Ultra sonogram
Ex.A3 dated 28.07.2011 Blood Test Reports
Ex.A4 dated 01.08.2011 Report Form for non-invasive imaging and Haemodynamic Laboratory
Ex.A5 dated 08.08.2011 Discharge Summary from Sri Ramachandra Medical Centre
Ex.A6 dated 27.12.2011 Insurance Policy
Ex.A7 dated 22.11.2012 Insurance Policy Renewal
Ex.A8 dated 25.11.2013 Insurance Policy Renewal
Ex.A9 dated 10.11.2014 Insurance Policy Renewal
Ex.A10 dated 14.01.2015 Authorisation for Cashless Treatment sent by the opposite party to the Hospital
Ex.A11 dated 14.01.2015 Investigation Report of Transthoracic Echocardiogram
Ex.A12 dated 15.01.2015 In-Patient Bill
Ex.A13 dated 15.01.2015 Payment Receipts
Ex.A14 dated 16.01.2015 Discharge Summary from Sri Ramachandra Medical Centre
Ex.A15 dated 16.01.2015 Biochemistry Report
Ex.A16 dated 16.01.2015 Report from Clinical pathology & Haemotology
Ex.A17 dated 18.01.2015 Discharge summary from Sri Ramachandra Medical Centre
Ex.A18 dated 18.01.2015 Admission Records
Ex.A19 dated 19.01.2015 Query on Pre Authorisation sent by the opposite party to the Sri Ramachandra Medical Centre
Ex.A20 dated 19.01.2015 Denial of Pre-authorisation for cashless Treatment
Ex.A21 dated 21.01.2015 Discharge Summary from Sri Ramachandra Medical Centre
Ex.A22 dated 21.01.2015 In-patient bill
Ex.A23 dated 22.01.2015 Claim Form Part-A filed by the petitioner
Ex.A24 dated 24.01.2015 Reimbursement of Medical Claim sent by the opposite party
Ex.A25 dated 27.01.2015 Reimbursement of Medical Claim sent by the opposite party
Ex.A26 dated 12.02.2015 Reminder sent by the opposite party
Ex.A27 dated 24.02.2015 Letter sent by the opposite party
Ex.A28 dated 28.02.2015 Reminder sent by the opposite party
Ex.A29 dated 06.0.2015 Letter sent by the opposite party
Ex.A30 dated 25.03.2015 Letter sent by the opposite party
Ex.A31 dated 06.04.2015 Policy Endorsement Schedule
Ex.A32 dated 08.04.2015 Letter sent by the opposite party
Ex.A33 dated 26.06.2015 Legal Notice sent on behalf of opposite party
Ex.A34 dated 08.07.2015 Reply Notice sent by opposite party
LIST OF DOCUMENTS FILED BY THE OPPOSITE PARTIES:
Ex.B1 dated 08.08.2011 Discharge Summary of complainant’s father at Sri-Ramachandra Medical Centre
Ex.B2 dated 23.12.2011 Proposal Form along with additional questionnaire
Ex.B3 dated NIL Insurance Policy with terms and conditions
Ex.B4 dated 24.02.2015 Opposite parties repudiating the claim of complainant
Ex.B5 dated 25.03.2015 Letter from opposite parties closing the 2nd claim of the complainant
Ex.B6 dated 08.04.2015 Letter from opposite parties cancelling the policy of the complainant
MEMBER – I PRESIDENT
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.