Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/201/2015

Kanchana, D/o.Vadivel Chettiyar - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.Sri Durga Tractors,Rep byits Regional Manager, and 3 Others - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.B.Kalyanasundaram

31 Mar 2022

ORDER

        STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                         BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                           Thiru.S.KARUPPIAH                                       ::  JUDICIAL  MEMBER

                                           Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::   MEMBER

 

                                                                                             CC. No. 201/2015

                                                                 DATED THIS THE 31^st  DAY OF MARCH 2022

Kanchana,

D/o, Vadivel Chettiyar,

No.13, Pinnapoondi village,

Durobathiammal koil street,

Elappakkam post,

Madurantakam Taluk,

Kancheepuram District                                               ..Complainant

                                                   Vs

 1. M/s Sri Durga Tractors,

Rep.by its Regional Manager,

No.184/192, R.K.Mutt Road,

Near Mandaveli Terminus,

Mandaveli, Chennai 600 004

 

2. M/s Mahendira Sakthiman,

Rep.by its dealer P.H. Abdul Majeed Marakayar,

No.36, Kancheepuram Road,

Fort Corner, Vandavasi – 604 408

Thiruvannamalai District

 

3. M/s Mahendira Gujarath Tractor Ltd,

Rep.by its Deputy Manager,

Mr.Vijaya Ragavan,

Regd. & Head office,

Vishwamitri Vadadora – 390 011

 

4. M/s United Bank of India,

Rep.by its Manager,

Varadan House,

No.18, 18A, T.K.Nambi street,

Kancheepuram – 631 501                                                   ..opposite parties

 

Counsel for the complainant             :  M/s B.Kalyana Sundaram

Counsel for the 2^nd opposite party     : M/s V.Balaji

Counsel for the 3^rd opposite party           : M/s Pass Associates

Opposite parties 1 & 4                          : set exparte

 

          This complaint is coming on before us for appearance of complainant and for arguments in list or for dismissal, we made the following order in open court : 

                                                 Docket order

No representation for complainant and 3^rd opposite party. Counsel for 2^nd opposite party present.  This complaint is posted today for appearance of complainant and for arguments (list) or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M,  the complainant was not present  hence,  passed over and  called again at 12.45 noon, then also the complainant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the complaint pending is of no use as the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case.  The complaint is dismissed for default.  No order as to cost.

  Sd/-                                                  Sd/-                                                            Sd/-

R.Venkatesaperumal                     S.Karuppiah                                            R.Subbiah

Member                                          Judl.Member                                           President