Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/324/2019

1.The Chief Manager, Indian Overseas Bank Main Office, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.And Another - Complainant(s)

Versus

M/s.S.V.Enterprises, Represented by its Proprietor, Having business at No.5/264A, Periyar Street, - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.K.Nethrasikamani

28 Feb 2023

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.324/2019

 

(Against the Order dt.03.09.2019 made in C.C. No.72/2018 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Chengalpattu @ Kancheepuram District)

DATED THE 28^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023

 

1. The Chief Manager,

Indian Overseas Bank,

Main Office, Anna Salai,

Chennai – 600 002. 

 

2. The Branch Manager,

Indian Overseas Bank,

No.5/81, G.S.T. Road,

Singaperumal Koil Branch,

Chengalpattu Taluk,

Kancheepuram District.                                               .. Appellants / Opposite parties.

 

-Versus-

M/s. S.V. Enterprises,

Represented by its Proprietor,

Having business at:

No.5/264 A, Periyar Street,

Vinjiyambakkam,

Singaperumal Koil Post,

Kancheepuram District – 603 204.                                 .. Respondent / Complainant.

 

Counsel for Appellants / Opposite parties                : M/s. Nethrasikamani

Counsel for Respondent / Complainant                   : M/s. G. Magesh Kumar

      

                This appeal coming up before us on 28.02.2023 for appearance of both parties, for filing written arguments of the appellant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                

 

 

 

Docket Order

 

Respondent present and ready for arguments. No representation for the appellant.  

This appeal is posted today for appearance of the appellant, for filing written arguments of the appellant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal. 

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the appellant was not present.   Hence, passed over and called again at 01.00 P.M. still, there is no representation for the appellant.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.    No order as to costs.

 

               

                Sd/-                                                                                              Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                        R.SUBBIAH                       

             MEMBER                                                                                     PRESIDENT